Educators should teach facts only after their students have studied the ideas, trends, and concepts that help explain those facts.
When it comes to the issue the best method of teaching, some people believe that educator should teach facts only after students about the ideas, trends, and concepts of the facts. However, others have the opposite view and think that this approach need many time. As far as I am concerned, the last point carries more weight. I take this position on account the following reason.
To begin with, this way of teaching helps students to have more background about the mater, and more focus on it. In fact, they can ask more questions and enrich their knowledge. Furthermore, students will be active in the class, think critically, discuss with teachers, and become more familiar with others aspects of the topic.
In contrast, time is a great factor that prohibits educators to use of this procedure. Indeed, teacher should wait much time that students have studied about idea, facts and concepts, because every issue have many aspects that learning them needs time. I think that a small example can give some light on this topic. For example when student want to study about the industrial revolution, he must spend much time to consider all its aspects. In economical angel, industrial revolution helps human to produce more in a short time. In addition, global economic had change tremendously, and people were able purchase wares with low prices. In biological angel, factories destroy plenty of forests to use their wood as well as making human habitations. Moreover, burning fossil fuels increased the amount of carbon dioxide, and intensified the global warming, which increase the Earth temperature, melting ice caps, changing the pattern of participation, and bringing long drought. So, the student has to devote much time to study each of these concepts.
All above evidence indicates that learning ideas, trends, and concepts, which are related the fact, let student to learn more and better, while the time is a great obstacle to use of this method for teaching.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-11 | bhavya_vasudeva | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | faatir | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | faatir | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | arubhardwaj | 54 | view |
- TPO-25 - Integrated Writing Task In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylin 86
- Is it better to enjoy your money when you earn it or is it better to save your money for some time in the future? Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 76
- Some people believe that university students should be required to attend classes. Others believe that going to classes should be optional for students. Which point of view do you agree with? Use specific reasons and details to explain your answer. 70
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people's efficiency so that they have more leisure time. 58
- "The surface of a section of Route 101, paved just two years ago by Good Intentions Roadways, is now badly cracked with a number of dangerous potholes. In another part of the state, a section of Route 40, paved by Appian Roadways more than four years ago, 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'many times'.
Suggestion: many times
... view and think that this approach need many time. As far as I am concerned, the last poi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 638, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...re able purchase wares with low prices. In biological angel, factories destroy ple...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'so', 'well', 'while', 'as to', 'for example', 'i think', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'in fact', 'as well as', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.255319148936 0.240241500013 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.151595744681 0.157235817809 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.103723404255 0.0880659088768 118% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0292553191489 0.0497285424764 59% => OK
Pronouns: 0.031914893617 0.0444667217837 72% => OK
Prepositions: 0.114361702128 0.12292977631 93% => OK
Participles: 0.0292553191489 0.0406280797675 72% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.48079112156 2.79330140395 89% => OK
Infinitives: 0.031914893617 0.030933414821 103% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.093085106383 0.0997080785238 93% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0159574468085 0.0249443105267 64% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0106382978723 0.0148568991511 72% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1984.0 2732.02544248 73% => OK
No of words: 326.0 452.878318584 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.08588957055 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.58838876751 93% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.358895705521 0.366273622748 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.266871165644 0.280924506359 95% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.180981595092 0.200843997647 90% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.101226993865 0.132149295362 77% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48079112156 2.79330140395 89% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 219.290929204 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585889570552 0.48968727796 120% => OK
Word variations: 65.4896012676 55.4138127331 118% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6194690265 82% => OK
Sentence length: 19.1764705882 23.380412469 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4010354107 59.4972553346 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.705882353 141.124799967 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1764705882 23.380412469 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.882352941176 0.674092028746 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 45.8635871527 51.4728631049 89% => OK
Elegance: 1.875 1.64882698954 114% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292644954861 0.391690518653 75% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0842296162085 0.123202303941 68% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0559561545702 0.077325440228 72% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.473979038457 0.547984918172 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.193767580365 0.149214159877 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965580659074 0.161403998019 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103084691647 0.0892212321368 116% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.347836541814 0.385218514788 90% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0189199790783 0.0692045440612 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204609102732 0.275328986314 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0884121881488 0.0653680567796 135% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88274336283 123% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 7.22455752212 111% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.