The teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom
Since the down of civilization, teacher has played significant role in the societies, and in the educating younger generations. They always have great influence on their pupils. However, a controversial question which is often raised regarding their role, is related to the social and political views of teacher. Some people are inclined toward the opinion that teachers must declare their perspectives and opinions for their students while others look at this debate through a different lens, and believe that it is not a proper behavior. Personally, I am more in agreement with the former group. In the following paragraphs, some conspicuous reasons will cogently substantiate my perspective.
The first noteworthy point regarding this issue is the responsibility of the teachers to bring up students who have the ability to think for themselves. They must teach their students to be independent. Students are usually looking up to their teachers and try to mimic them. If the teacher speaks about his opinion, his students will think that this opinion is the proper one. They will not try to make a decision for themselves, something that goes against the teachers’ guidelines. For instance, imagine that you are trying to decide about the best way to participate in civil practices. Then, you hear in the class that your teacher says in his opinion, the best way is to help in animal shelters. Here, you will think that he is right. It is the best option. However, now you have a problem. You are not thinking for yourself.
In addition to what was mentioned above, as recent studies have revealed, almost all of the children think that their teacher is never wrong. In fact, a study which was conducted in Denmark on more than 1000 elementary students, revealed that roughly 95 percent of this students believe that their teachers always are right. Now if the teacher speaks about his beliefs in front of his students, these children will think that his ideas are the correct ones, and they will follow them; even if the teacher is wrong.
To make a long story short, all the aforementioned reasons lead to the conclusion that it is better that teachers do not speak about their views in the classrooms. However, that was a story in nutshell; actually, there are some other reasons and example, regarding the claim, which are not mentioned above. Finally, it is suggested that a survey be conducted to find out exact factors involved in this issue.
- Nowadays people are more willing to help, they did not know for example, by giving clothes or food to people who need them than they were in the past. To what extend do you agree? 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students can get as many benefits from organization or club activities as they can get from their academic studies. 58
- 1 2 3 70
- The reading claims that the story of the burning mirror and Roman ships is a myth. However, the lecturer refutes this claim. In the following paragraphs, you will see her reasons to reject this claim. 73
- dianosur 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...as recent studies have revealed, almost all of the children think that their teacher is ne...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ts, revealed that roughly 95 percent of this students believe that their teachers al...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'regarding', 'so', 'then', 'while', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'in fact']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.19313304721 0.229887763892 84% => OK
Verbs: 0.171673819742 0.158761421928 108% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0708154506438 0.0866891130778 82% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0600858369099 0.046263068375 130% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0793991416309 0.0685040099705 116% => OK
Prepositions: 0.122317596567 0.118717715034 103% => OK
Participles: 0.0364806866953 0.0351676179071 104% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.70444556742 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0300429184549 0.0309702414327 97% => OK
Particles: 0.00643776824034 0.00188951952338 341% => OK
Determiners: 0.0987124463519 0.0887237588012 111% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0171673819742 0.0209618222197 82% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0128755364807 0.0139019557991 93% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2460.0 2387.08602151 103% => OK
No of words: 412.0 408.028673835 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.97087378641 5.86048508987 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.48200974243 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.344660194175 0.338922669872 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.266990291262 0.251872472559 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.191747572816 0.174417080927 110% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.116504854369 0.112833075102 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70444556742 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497572815534 0.524397521467 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 54.8924892878 59.2087087015 93% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6684587814 111% => OK
Sentence length: 17.9130434783 20.5533526081 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6715921368 48.84282405 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.956521739 120.699889404 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9130434783 20.5533526081 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.565217391304 0.644075263715 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 44.6120726045 45.7405998639 98% => OK
Elegance: 1.13103448276 1.45489161554 78% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413403348015 0.300154397459 138% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0893872788556 0.103427244359 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.069019264262 0.0752933317313 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.451809454385 0.497263757937 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.158726400318 0.151897553556 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148050512756 0.114077575197 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086283384821 0.0781384742642 110% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.416575128135 0.336927656856 124% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0588893464819 0.067059652881 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302966716777 0.210909579961 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546368176923 0.0618886996521 88% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8870967742 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.86379928315 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.91756272401 224% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 8.42114695341 59% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.4623655914 81% => OK
Neutral topic words: 8.0 2.75985663082 290% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.6433691756 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.