Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
There has been a significant population of emigrants settling in large, metropolitan cities in Australia such as Sydney, Melbourne, Gold Coast and Canberra. As a result there has been a tremendous increase in the number of motor vehicles on these roads leading upto traffic congestions.
Sydney amonst all has an unprecedented increase in such numbers with more time, money and emotional energy being spent on the roads. Driving in Sydney has become a nightmare and as a result, more and more people opt the railway mode rather than drive their own car in order to save time stuck in traffic and reduce the costs in parking fees. As a result Sydney has one of the sophisticated and efficient railway systems in Australia. Rather than spending hours on congested roads, arriving at a destination under 20 minutes via the railway has become the appealing choice for commuters. For the regular commuters the use of the Opal card, Companion card or another available seasonal card has resulted in saving money on transportation as these cards offer discounted prices for daily commuters at the added advantage of not having to purchase a ticket regularly.
The Gold Coast has recently built the light railway called the Tram to transport people to and around the main locations within the city. This has resulted in the establishment of one-way streets creating proper order on the roads with reduced traffic conditions.
Similarly, there are plans by the Labour party to implement the tram system within Canberra. However, with the Liberals having majority stake in the Parliament, this debate of building the light railway rather than spending the money on the upcoming hospital is something of the future. In such a situation rather than investing on building the railway which probably may not be popular amongst the locals, more money should be invested on upgrading and maintaining the world class road system which Canberra is famous for.
In conclusion, I am in agreement of more money being spent on the railway in cities like Sydney and Melbourne. However, it is a calculated risk which should only be implemented if the public is to benefit rather than burdening them with more taxes.
- Some people think the government is wasting money on the arts and this money could be better spent elsewhere. To what extent do you agree with this view? 67
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.Choose which position you most ag 73
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 84
- Many people think regions affect successful persons. What is your opinion about native regions and accomplished person influence on the regions they belong to? 78
- Wild animals have no use in the 21st century and trying to preserve animals now is just a waste of money. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ey, Melbourne, Gold Coast and Canberra. As a result there has been a tremendous in...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['however', 'if', 'may', 'similarly', 'so', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.287179487179 0.247107183377 116% => OK
Verbs: 0.148717948718 0.155533422707 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0948717948718 0.0946595960268 100% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0358974358974 0.0501214627716 72% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0102564102564 0.0437548338989 23% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.164102564103 0.122226691241 134% => OK
Participles: 0.0769230769231 0.0403226058552 191% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.69154605376 2.80594681477 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0153846153846 0.0326793684256 47% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.123076923077 0.0861772015684 143% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00769230769231 0.021408717616 36% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00769230769231 0.011925033212 65% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2201.0 1933.35771543 114% => OK
No of words: 363.0 316.048096192 115% => OK
Chars per words: 6.06336088154 6.12580529183 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20517956788 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.391184573003 0.374742101984 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.269972451791 0.28420135186 95% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.192837465565 0.203846283523 95% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.126721763085 0.137316102897 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69154605376 2.80594681477 96% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.037074148 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537190082645 0.56093040696 96% => OK
Word variations: 58.8101142852 60.7387585426 97% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0891783567 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.9285714286 20.7743622355 125% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3087381002 49.517814964 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.214285714 127.492653851 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9285714286 20.7743622355 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.571428571429 0.814263465372 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 52.9258166076 49.1944974215 108% => OK
Elegance: 2.71052631579 1.69124875643 160% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115664742632 0.332605444948 35% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.14164529581 0.102741220458 138% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0684493661485 0.0668466124924 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.645096267325 0.534860350844 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.103792711672 0.148594505496 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600565096274 0.134430193775 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0280467244855 0.0742795772207 38% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.429826861188 0.324371583561 133% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0606531305779 0.0638462369009 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0792811222763 0.228012699653 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290825173335 0.058150111329 50% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.68436873747 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.41683366733 88% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 5.90881763527 102% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.5751503006 78% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 1.9629258517 153% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.4468937876 105% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.