Whether or not someone achieve their aims is mostly a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The debate whether luck is the primary determinant of success in achieving targets has been heated constantly. My position is that hard work and determination are far more important than luck, while luck must not be considered as the main precursor of the attainment of one’s goals.
I advocate the notion that the role of being industrious and determined is more significant than luck. Thomas Edison, one of the greatest inventors in the 20th century, is an excellent example of such a notion. He conducted numerous experiments with the filament until the finest light bulb was produced; and his hard work, rather than luck, was acknowledged by all the human race. Another clear evidence of this notion is the case of Nguyen Ngoc Ky. This disabled man could not write by hand, but he was determined enough to teach himself to write by foot. The fact that he would then became one of the greatest teachers in the history of education in Vietnam provides a concrete foundation that even with bad luck, determination could result in goal achievement.
By contrast, I believe the saying that fortune has a major part to play is just a fallacy. One clear reason is that although there may have been a number of people reaching their goals with good luck, such good luck in most cases only comes to people who have worked hard. Take Mendeleev as an example. As a research chemist, he worked tirelessly for a few decades, until one day in his dream, the complete arrangement of the elements appeared. The appearance of this arrangement could be ascribed to luck, but no one could deny the extreme effort that Mendeleev had exerted. Another clear reason for my belief is that luck could only lead people to short-term achievements, and there is nothing to ascertain that it would continue to exist in the long run. The over-reliance on good fortune, as a result, would prevent people from achieving their long-term or life-long aims.
In brief, I think the importance of luck in determining goal attainment is overstated, while there are much more significant factors to consider, namely hard work and determination.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | sepide1367 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Niusha | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lydunhien | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | longpm2k | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | torontoontario | 84 | view |
- Too much emphasis is placed on going to university for academic study People should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified tradespeople such as electricians or plumbers To what extent do you agree or disagree 68
- Whether or not someone achieve their aims is mostly a question of luck. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.Choose which position you most ag 73
- Age discrimination occurs when a decision is made on the basis of a person’s age. In the workplace, these are most often decisions about being employed in the first place, winning promotions or being unfairly dismissed. Should discrimination against old 67
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.Choose which position you most ag 67
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'while', 'i think', 'in brief', 'as a result', 'in most cases']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.238095238095 0.247107183377 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.157894736842 0.155533422707 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0927318295739 0.0946595960268 98% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0426065162907 0.0501214627716 85% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0375939849624 0.0437548338989 86% => OK
Prepositions: 0.140350877193 0.122226691241 115% => OK
Participles: 0.0426065162907 0.0403226058552 106% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.75412395314 2.80594681477 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0225563909774 0.0326793684256 69% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.100250626566 0.0861772015684 116% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0250626566416 0.021408717616 117% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00250626566416 0.011925033212 21% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2120.0 1933.35771543 110% => OK
No of words: 359.0 316.048096192 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90529247911 6.12580529183 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20517956788 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.323119777159 0.374742101984 86% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.24791086351 0.28420135186 87% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.194986072423 0.203846283523 96% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.125348189415 0.137316102897 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75412395314 2.80594681477 98% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.037074148 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551532033426 0.56093040696 98% => OK
Word variations: 61.0629390395 60.7387585426 101% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0891783567 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.4375 20.7743622355 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.089011457 49.517814964 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.5 127.492653851 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4375 20.7743622355 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.625 0.814263465372 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 47.228586351 49.1944974215 96% => OK
Elegance: 1.76842105263 1.69124875643 105% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169659992025 0.332605444948 51% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0912519818296 0.102741220458 89% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0721360361774 0.0668466124924 108% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.524075073961 0.534860350844 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.200071053568 0.148594505496 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736915417297 0.134430193775 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352781155191 0.0742795772207 47% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.36462332275 0.324371583561 112% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.105873932855 0.0638462369009 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122359569525 0.228012699653 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282187283737 0.058150111329 49% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.68436873747 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.41683366733 29% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 5.90881763527 186% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.5751503006 39% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 1.9629258517 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 12.0 10.4468937876 115% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.