Integrated 31: The evidences which approved Sinasauropteryx was feathered dianosaure
In this set of materials, the professor mainly discusses critics which have opposed the idea that Sinasauropteryx was a feathered dinosaur, while the professor casts doubt on what is presented in the text and believes that all the evidences are strong and the arguments is unconvincing.
First of all, in the text it is clearly mentioned that the fine lines may have be decomposed skin which turned to fibers due to volcanic ash. However, the professor claims that such this decomposition has not been recorder by any fossils in same site, In fact, all the fossils have been pretty preserved by the volcanic ashes, and proved that the lines feathers not the fibers which had been produced from the skin.
In addition, the professor disagrees with the statement that fine line are remains of frills not the feathers. She points out that these structures have completely different chemical elements. The feather contains particular type of protein that the frill does not have and chemical analysis of the fossils conclude that specific protein. Consequently, the remained structures are feathers not frills.
Finally, although in the text it is stated that the placement of lines made them quite useless, the professor subscribes to the view point that the feathers have a variety of functions. For instance, some birds have beautiful feathers on their tail to attract their mates. Therefore, the Sinasauropteryx\s feathers had some functional reasons. Beside this issue that the analysis of the line revealed that the feather were colorful, orange and white, which is very supportive evidence that Sinasauropteryx was feathered dinosaur.
- TPO 21 85
- Do you agree or disagree: young people should try many different kinds of jobs or career before they decide the long term career of their life. 90
- TPO 8 3
- A/D: Parents should give school-age children money as reward for getting a high mark in their schools 70
- Has the ease of the cooking improved life? 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 80, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... mentioned that the fine lines may have be decomposed skin which turned to fibers ...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['consequently', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'in fact', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.256944444444 0.261695866417 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.170138888889 0.158904122519 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0729166666667 0.0723426182421 101% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0520833333333 0.0435111971325 120% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0208333333333 0.0277247811725 75% => OK
Prepositions: 0.135416666667 0.128828473217 105% => OK
Participles: 0.0486111111111 0.0370669169778 131% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.82427532084 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0138888888889 0.0208969081088 66% => OK
Particles: 0.00347222222222 0.00154638098197 225% => OK
Determiners: 0.138888888889 0.128158765124 108% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00347222222222 0.0158828679856 22% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0173611111111 0.0114777025283 151% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1641.0 1645.83664459 100% => OK
No of words: 262.0 271.125827815 97% => OK
Chars per words: 6.26335877863 6.08160592843 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04852973271 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.370229007634 0.374372842146 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.309160305344 0.287516216867 108% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.259541984733 0.187439937562 138% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.160305343511 0.113142543107 142% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82427532084 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549618320611 0.539623497131 102% => OK
Word variations: 54.5410563103 53.8517498576 101% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0529801325 84% => OK
Sentence length: 23.8181818182 21.7502111507 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.4885592192 49.3711431718 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.181818182 132.220823453 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 21.7502111507 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.18181818182 0.878197800319 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 54.7342123525 50.5018328374 108% => OK
Elegance: 1.81428571429 1.90840788429 95% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230144587781 0.549887131256 42% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.135596875523 0.142949733639 95% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0753507769673 0.0787303798458 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.632194039572 0.631733273073 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.21663446652 0.139662658121 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11167591208 0.266732575781 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763306446781 0.103435571967 74% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.463408320002 0.414875509568 112% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0213444639435 0.0530846634433 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180113256058 0.40443939384 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591021566181 0.0528353158467 112% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.