TPO 46 - Question 6
| Post dates | Users | rates | Contents |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-10-27 | naznazu | 70.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2016-08-09 | Numfon Weidinger | 80.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2017-10-09 | mgrajapt | 65.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2018-10-17 | mgrajapt | 68.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2019-10-22 | Seema Modak | 66.00 | Check this speaking |
- 2478 how has the sport changed in the last 50 years? 80
- 834 what effect has the internet had on the way people generally communicate with each other? 52
- TPO 02 - Question 6 70
- 740 the second in terms of personality, are people more influenced by their family or by their friends? 80
- 496 do you think that bicycles are suitable for all ages? 70
Comments
Hello.
Hello.
I have a question about this type of questions. i have listened other test takers and noticed that some people add details which were not said in the lecture. For instance, http://www.testbig.com/comment/56597
He added that someone has played for 10-15 years. My question is what is the purpose of this type of question? Should I paraphrase the lecture or try to convey the meaning as close as possible to the original?
We didn't get 'someone has
We didn't get 'someone has played for 10-15 years' in the speech. The purpose is to ask us paraphrasing the lecture but pick up only the main features. This is the pattern for Q6:
Introduction. something like 'The professor is talking about....'. (about two sentences in 10-15 seconds)
Example 1, blabla... about 20-25 seconds //Don't spend too much time on the first example
Example 2, blabla... about 20-25 seconds
Hello.
I just try to understand
21 in 30
reason one can be developed better.