TPO 46 - Question 6
| Post dates | Users | rates | Contents |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-09 | Rasna James | 86.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2016-12-18 | donya goodarz | Check this speaking | |
| 2016-10-27 | naznazu | 70.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2018-10-17 | mgrajapt | 68.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2018-06-25 | Mortezaa | 50.00 | Check this speaking |
- 1401 Tell me about your family. 70
- 949 is this different from the kind of achievement that made people famous in the past 60
- 753 first some people think that education should be about memorizing the important ideas of the past. do you agree? 70
- 5-2. Do you think it is better to marry before or after the age of 30? Use reasons tosupport your response. 73
- 11-2 Would you prefer to go to the opera or to a football game? Use reasons and detailsto support response. 70
Comments
Hello.
Hello.
I have a question about this type of questions. i have listened other test takers and noticed that some people add details which were not said in the lecture. For instance, http://www.testbig.com/comment/56597
He added that someone has played for 10-15 years. My question is what is the purpose of this type of question? Should I paraphrase the lecture or try to convey the meaning as close as possible to the original?
We didn't get 'someone has
We didn't get 'someone has played for 10-15 years' in the speech. The purpose is to ask us paraphrasing the lecture but pick up only the main features. This is the pattern for Q6:
Introduction. something like 'The professor is talking about....'. (about two sentences in 10-15 seconds)
Example 1, blabla... about 20-25 seconds //Don't spend too much time on the first example
Example 2, blabla... about 20-25 seconds
Hello.
I just try to understand
21 in 30
reason one can be developed better.