TPO 46 - Question 6
| Post dates | Users | rates | Contents |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-22 | Seema Modak | 66.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2016-08-05 | nahid89 | Check this speaking | |
| 2019-12-13 | jeffhjz | 80.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2017-05-29 | aceit | 71.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2016-08-05 | nahid89 | Check this speaking |
- How much time do children spend with their parents in your country? do you think that is enough? 60
- 10 1114 what kinds of food do you like to eat 73
- 2275 do you believe international sport brings people together? 80
- 2877 describe a colorful place that you visitedyou should saywhere you wentwho went there with youwhy you wentand why it left an impession on you. 80
- TPO 47 - Question 4 70
Comments
Hello.
Hello.
I have a question about this type of questions. i have listened other test takers and noticed that some people add details which were not said in the lecture. For instance, http://www.testbig.com/comment/56597
He added that someone has played for 10-15 years. My question is what is the purpose of this type of question? Should I paraphrase the lecture or try to convey the meaning as close as possible to the original?
We didn't get 'someone has
We didn't get 'someone has played for 10-15 years' in the speech. The purpose is to ask us paraphrasing the lecture but pick up only the main features. This is the pattern for Q6:
Introduction. something like 'The professor is talking about....'. (about two sentences in 10-15 seconds)
Example 1, blabla... about 20-25 seconds //Don't spend too much time on the first example
Example 2, blabla... about 20-25 seconds
Hello.
I just try to understand
21 in 30
reason one can be developed better.