TPO 46 - Question 6
| Post dates | Users | rates | Contents |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-17 | mgrajapt | 68.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2018-08-22 | Aftab1 | 66.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2019-12-13 | jeffhjz | 80.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2016-11-06 | EugeneDubinchuk | 70.00 | Check this speaking |
| 2017-05-29 | aceit | 71.00 | Check this speaking |
- 2472 describe a sport you chose to watch recentlyyou should saywhat kind of sport it iswhen it was onhow long it laster forand why you wanted to watch it? 70
- 1426 How can we stop young people today watching too much television? 70
- TPO 06 - Question 1Talk about a photograph or painting you have seen that was memorable. Explain what you liked or disliked about it. 70
- 1989 is it acceptable for couples to live together without marrying? 77
- 646 describe a person you know who is kind you should say who it is how you know this person what sort of person he she is and explain why you think they are kind 87
Comments
Hello.
Hello.
I have a question about this type of questions. i have listened other test takers and noticed that some people add details which were not said in the lecture. For instance, http://www.testbig.com/comment/56597
He added that someone has played for 10-15 years. My question is what is the purpose of this type of question? Should I paraphrase the lecture or try to convey the meaning as close as possible to the original?
We didn't get 'someone has
We didn't get 'someone has played for 10-15 years' in the speech. The purpose is to ask us paraphrasing the lecture but pick up only the main features. This is the pattern for Q6:
Introduction. something like 'The professor is talking about....'. (about two sentences in 10-15 seconds)
Example 1, blabla... about 20-25 seconds //Don't spend too much time on the first example
Example 2, blabla... about 20-25 seconds
Hello.
I just try to understand
21 in 30
reason one can be developed better.