Modern technology has made it easier for individuals to download copyrighted music and books from the internet for no charge.
To what extent is this a positive or a negative development?
With the drastic growth of the technology, numerous trends have been changed. Nowadays, every individual is technopathy. They can listen, read and write anything freely on the internet. Some people assert that downloading the free books and music is an appropriate way while others condemn this view that it poses a huge loss to the creator. This essay will scrutinize the both virtues and will suggest a solution for this sophisticated solution.
To embark with, availability of various journals, magazines and music albums on the Internet is a boon for society. Not every individual afford to purchase the costly books of overseas authors as well as renowned audios of vocalists. Also, it is one of the convenient ways to read and listen such things. However, getting each and everything within the seconds is again a time-saving as well as the money-saving process which lends a helping hand a crucial role in anyone's life.
On the flip side, advocates of this viewpoint said that by copying all from world wide web the writers will face a huge collapse in their salary. As their sole mode of earning income is the creative instincts which they utilized in developing such writings. If youngsters would not purchase their writings then there will be no use of writing. Apart from this, it is also a kind of stealing. Albeit, it is against our moral values.
Hammering the last nail of this topic, every coin has two sides. Writers should upload only those items which contain their least efforts and they should also find the other ways to benefitting themselves. On the contrary, modern generation should also download such thing which is out of their reach instead of everything.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-24 | cindycornelia98 | 56 | view |
| 2019-10-24 | junjunh | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-23 | junjunh | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-18 | moeinynsi | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | Gowridevaraj | 73 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of monthly household income spent on various items by two different groups in one European country. 95
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university. 11
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of major university in 2012. 61
- The graphs below show the number of men and women in full and part-time employment in Australia between 1973 and 1993. 67
- The diagram below shows the typical stages of consumer goods manufacturing including the process by which information is fed back to earlier stages to enable adjustment 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 147, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...l face a huge collapse in their salary. As their sole mode of earning income is th...
^^
Line 5, column 259, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...y utilized in developing such writings. If youngsters would not purchase their wri...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, then, well, while, apart from, kind of, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98586572438 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60544103573 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639575971731 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8430311099 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6470588235 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171443857372 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478064257086 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422186751819 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943085896618 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411043439577 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.