The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and even be damaging. Do you agree or disagree?
Advertising is considered completely useless and even detrimental to the society and thereby, people believe that imposing a ban on it may bring about benefits for a country. While I acknowledge the downsides of advertisements, I would argue that there should not be a complete ban
On the one hand, there are several reasons to believe that advertising has negative impacts on our life. Firstly, manufacturers and entrepreneurs, in order to boost up their sales and profits, spare no effort to promote their products with captivating advertisements, which may consists of stunning pictures, extraordinary effects and exaggerated contents. This stimulates potential buyers and results in impulsive purchases of unnecessary commodities. Secondly, some companies deliberately aims at children, and what they do is that they expose children to colorful and appealing commercials for products such as toys. Since the young children are inexperienced, they are apparently influenced by these advertisements and consequently put pressure on their parents to purchase them items.
On the other hand, I hold the perception that prohibition of advertisements is not a sound initiative. From economic perspective, without the existence of commercials, the country economy would suffer severely. There may be a boom in unemployment rate as those who are working in the advertising industry would become jobless. In addition, companies could face plenty of challenges improving their profits owing to the fact that less consumers area aware of their products and services. From buyers’ perspective, commercials keep them informed on different products and alternatives that are available. As a result, consumers may find it challenging making purchases as there is little information on the choices that they are offered.
In conclusion, advertising, albeit being harmful to the community somehow, appears to have vital roles in maintaining economic progress. As such, I believe that banning it is not reasonable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-20 | Massi-Amiri | 89 | view |
| 2019-02-20 | Massi-Amiri | 61 | view |
| 2019-02-20 | Massi-Amiri | 89 | view |
| 2019-02-20 | Massi-Amiri | 78 | view |
| 2019-02-20 | Massi-Amiri | 67 | view |
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 56
- In Response to Wangari Mathai’s Article on the Effect of Patenting Life Forms 73
- In the future, it seems more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planet to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- In many schools and universities, girls tend to choose arts subjects and boys choose science subjects. What do you think are the reasons? Do you think that this tendency should be changed? 78
- Nowadays young people spend too much of their free time in shopping malls Some people fear that this may have negative effects on young people and the society they live in 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 430, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun consumers is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ng their profits owing to the fact that less consumers area aware of their products ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 435, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'consumers'' or 'consumer's'?
Suggestion: consumers'; consumer's
...eir profits owing to the fact that less consumers area aware of their products and servic...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6821192053 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32656066786 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612582781457 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2698214541 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.571428571 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153880460811 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048890420241 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0449716485196 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0957560757909 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574693992639 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 9.78957915832 215% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.