Line graph - differences in birth rates in China and the US
The line graph illustrates the differences in birth rates in China and the US over a period of 80 years, from 1920 to 2000.
Overall, the average annual number of births in the two countries showed almost them same pattern which decreased over the period.
At the beginning of the period, the birth rates in China and the US was almost the same, 10% and 15 %, respectively. From 1920 to 1935, the number of births in China increased to 15% before falling sharp to 5% in 1940. The figure remained stable in the next five years, and followed by a rocket climb to the highest rate, of 20% in 1948, throughout the 80-year period. However, the China birth rate saw a rapid decline to 10% in five years, and continued to go down gradually to the bottom at 2% by the end of the period.
When it comes to the US birth rate, the same pattern was occurred but less pronounced. The data shown a fluctuation in the first two decades; and then dropped significantly to below 5% in 1945 before reaching the its own peak at 15% in 1950. However, the figures started to decline gradually in the over the remainder of the period and stopped at 7%, about three times as high as that number of China by the year 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a fluctuation in the first two decades; and then dropped significantly to below ...
^^
Line 7, column 211, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'its'?
Suggestion: the; its
...tly to below 5% in 1945 before reaching the its own peak at 15% in 1950. However, the f...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42152466368 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36059001186 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511210762332 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.022624266 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.555555556 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359650062357 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162871243789 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161287711999 0.0843802449381 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246757447627 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.191422395294 0.0819641961636 234% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.