Foreign tourists must be charged higher fees than local people to visit cultural places and historical sites. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion including relevant examples.
Visiting to ancestral region and symbolic place are the main aim of every tourist. However, fees distribution to foreigners and national visitors are the heated topic of controversy. In this essay I firmly agree with the concept of foreign visitors must be charged more fees than the inhabitants because, tourism development and national economic growth from the outsiders are the peak source of national financial status.
Firstly, travel and tourism are the main criteria for the growth and development of a nation. Visiting such cultural sites and historical region would enhance the countries pride to other areas of the world through foreigners. For instance, visiting an ancestral place by the foreign tourist, would experience the new culture and skills of the innate communities. That will be the new chance for them to learn and research such divisions. So that, taking advantage for the new ideas and skills from the visiting countries might take higher fees for them to establish innovative creativity and flourish such historical places value.
On the other hand, local people must be aware of their own national cultures and civilization. Government should reduce the fees charges to the nationalities to nourish the inherited fortune of country and have an inevitable knowledge regarding own country. Tourism is not only the economic growth but also the theoretical and practical knowledge of one country. Although, money is an essential part, rather than, national growth would be developed by the inborn skills of every individual. In addition, charge for local people would subside only they could have interest to visit such places and there by improve our culture development often.
In conclusion, charging for the tourist is reliable as per the historical advances and development of a nation, while, higher pay for the local people might subside the overall development of symbolic places. Whereas, foreigners have the urge to know the various cultural diversity of a different region, they must be charged higher for the economy and tourism development.
- The chart below shows the average daily minimum and maximum levels of two air pollutants in four big cities in 2000.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The maps below show the university campus at present and in the future after some planned changes Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Shopping habits depend more on your age group than anything else To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The diagrams below show the present building of a college and the plan for changes to the college site in the future 74
- The picture below shows the recycling process of wasted glass bottles. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, so, whereas, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37195121951 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73847023258 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521341463415 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.270098606 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.466666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8666666667 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27169851025 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0957675592242 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589136078341 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17760082602 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279134369507 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.