To improve the quality of education, universities should spend money on salaries university professors.
No one can ignore the important role of professors in the education system. Without the professors there were be no students. Although I understand that professor has a vital role in the quality of education, I have a different opinion. I do not think increasing the salaries for professors will lead to a better education. To improve the quality of the education system we have to spend money on other necessities in campus like libraries and dorms or even cafeteria. The basis of my opinion is educational, social and personal.
Educationally, students need access to the internet and the text books.
Students in the universities are assigned to do many projects and paper work. The best place to get all the essential information is from libraries. They also want a quite area to concentrate and focus, libraries is the favored for most of them. To improve the quality of education in university, money should be spending to update the infrastructure on campus. To improve the quality of education, the universities should spend more money by supplying the libraries with better computer system, more seats for students and up to date textbooks. That way we could have better libraries and consequently better education.
Socially, universities should spend some of their money on building cafeterias. It is convenient to have more than one cafeteria in the campus. For instance, I remember when I was in the college there was only one cafeteria and I should walk for about 15 minutes to get my coffee. I always feel exhausted and tired to go there. Many times I decided not to go to the cafeteria. I did not drink coffee or even I could not find a place to relax. I would not be able to focus and concentrate the rest of the day, which affect my quality of education. However, if there is more than one cafeteria it will provide the chance for students to relax and communicate. Students will use their break and lunch time to eat food and drink something; they still have a long day of learning. That way, students don’t have to waste their time going off campus searching for restaurant or other coffee shop to eat.
Personally, colleges should use their extra money to build more dorm rooms for the new students. When I first apply to the college, there are no rooms available at that moment. So I decided to search for an apartment off campus. It was about an hour away from the campus. It was really hard every day I went and came back from the apartment to the campus. I was very exhausted and tired, which has a negative impact on my concentration. It ended up with bad result at the end of the year. The following year on the other hand, the college spends more money on building more rooms. Having more rooms in campus facilitate the education process. Students could save time and focus on their study. Dorms in campus help student for better progress in their education. That is why I think spending money on having more dorms rooms will enhance the quality of education.
In conclusion for the reason I mention above, I encourage all universities to use the money on other important necessities than increase the professor salaries. Having library is the good source for improving the quality of education. Cafeteria is another source to help students get relaxed and continue their education process.
- do you agree or disagree young adult are not helping their community 60
- workers are satisfied when they have many different type of tasks to do during the work day than when they do similar tasks all day long 60
- Parents today are more involved in their children’s education than were parents in the past. 70
- TPO INTEGRATED 22 73
- tpo integraded 33 -2 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
No one can ignore the important role of ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 115, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...stem. Without the professors there were be no students. Although I understand that...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is educational, social and personal. Educationally, students need access to t...
^^^^
Line 4, column 165, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('quite') instead an adjective, or a noun ('area') instead of another adjective.
...ation is from libraries. They also want a quite area to concentrate and focus, libraries is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd consequently better education. Socially, universities should spend some...
^^^^
Line 7, column 333, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s feel exhausted and tired to go there. Many times I decided not to go to the ca...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...taurant or other coffee shop to eat. Personally, colleges should use their ex...
^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll enhance the quality of education. In conclusion for the reason I mention a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, really, so, still, for instance, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 52.1666666667 151% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2766.0 1977.66487455 140% => OK
No of words: 575.0 407.700716846 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81043478261 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89685180668 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73119014752 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 245.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.426086956522 0.524837075471 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 889.2 618.680645161 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 38.0 20.6003584229 184% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3722398261 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.7894736842 100.406767564 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1315789474 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.45110844103 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.53405017921 132% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.85842293907 207% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.88709677419 286% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255505339195 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616965324717 0.076458572812 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948426854807 0.0737576698707 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143507015288 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0984899745343 0.0645574589148 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 11.7677419355 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 58.1214874552 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.18 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 86.8835125448 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.