Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationship that people make?
Has this been a positive or negative development?
Recent years have seen enormous changes in the way people's communication is affected by new technologies such as social network and telecommunication. However, while these advances have brought some drawbacks to people's lives, it can be argued that this development has resulted in more positive impacts that negative.
There is no getting away from the fact that this revolution in the types of communication follows some negative points. Firstly, as people spend more time interacting through for example social networks, they spend less time for face- to- face communication. As a consequence, in comparison to the past when people connect to each other at present, they gradually lose their personal contact. Secondly, there are considerable potential risks in modern ways. It means that unless a person careful enough, it is easily possible to have access on their personal information and take advantages in immoral ways. Finally, trusting has been declined among people in virtual world. It derives from this fact that it is not possible to know anybody's true identity.
With considering mentioned point, there is no doubt that this development has been more beneficial in various aspects of people's lives, for instance in business. Communication between clients and customers has been simpler, faster and safer by using Email and for example Skype. In addition it has been possible to pursue employment opportunities or seek new business client via a website like LinkedIn. This illustrates that modern ways of communication eradicates the limits imposed by physical world and makes it possible to interact and change information with people everywhere. It leads to be more successful in the market.
Furthermore, new communication methods can affect people's social life directly. For example, through social network people are able to stay in contact with their friends and relatives and reconnect with old friend from the past. As well as, modern ways allow people to broaden social reach both personally and professionally. This provides opportunities for people to connect with strangers in far- distant places in order to sharing similar interests.
In conclusion, communication with others has changed beyond recognition with the use of new technologies. This revolution can be more positive provided that considering and managing the effects.
- Some people consider price as the most important thing to consider when buying a product (such as a cellphone) or a service (e.g medical treatment) do you agree or disagree? 84
- Scientist tell us about the activities which are good for our health and other which are bad. Millions of people all over the world know this and still do unhealthy activities. Why do you think this is? And what can be done to change it? 89
- Some people fail in school but end up being successful in life Why do you think that is the case What is the most important thing to succeed in life 98
- In the developed world, average life expectancy is increasing. What problems will this cause for individuals and societies? Suggest some measurements that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations. 84
- Education is thought by some to be the best way to get a good job. On the other hand, other people think that getting experience and developing soft skills is more important. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...y using Email and for example Skype. In addition it has been possible to pursue employme...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2007.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49863013699 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98320060208 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564383561644 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9458055837 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.631578947 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2105263158 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94736842105 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316236889633 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08869579415 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582103885416 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178139573603 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355826418643 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.