With a fast pace of modern life more and more people are turning towards fast food for their main meals.
Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In today’s society, people are leaving traditional eating habits and enjoying fast food as main meals to accommodate with rising contemporary lifestyles. While I accept that consuming these prepared foods can sometimes have a positive effect on the eaters, I believe that they are more likely to have a harmful impact.
On the one hand, having Fast food can be both time saving and entertaining. People have a little opportunity to cook at home, because most family members are busy in professional job life. Cooking at home is a time consuming and diligent task. After a day hard work, It will be the most convenient choice for them to have a fast food as meal rather than cooking. For Instance, both my wife and I should stay out of home from morning to evening for our daily office works, and after a day tireless works we barely could cook for us. Thus we prefer to have fast food at mealtime rather than cooking. In addition, having fast food is an opening for the person who wants to amuse himself by altering usual meal flavor. People could get bored after long time enjoying same tastes meal, and enjoying fast food offers them a new experience.
However, I would argue that these benefits are outweighed by the drawbacks. Most fast food items have little nutriment value. Its contain sugar, cholesterol and salt component which are extremely detrimental for individual well being. Eating fast foods daily will make us have diabetes or gain obesity. The rise in overweight population has also been linked to these eating habits. Another downside is that many restaurants food processing systems are not hygienic. They have mixed different kinds of preservatives and chemical during cooking stages which are unhealthy for human being. A recent survey shows that in Bangladesh 40% restaurants are using chemicals for food preparation which could be initiate the risk of diseases like cancer, diabetes, heart attack. Furthermore, the price of fast foods is more expensive, so it could enhance our daily living cost.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the potential dangers of fast foods are more significant than the possible benefits.
- In recent years, the family structure and the role of its members are gradually changing. What kinds of changes can occur? Do you think these changes are positive or negative? 78
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries, many small, local businesses are unable to compete. Some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities.To what extent do you ag 61
- Education is not a luxury, but a basic human right and as such should be free for everyone irrespective of personal wealth.Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people believe that scientists are controlling the world, others, however, others believe that politicians are controlling the world, discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Although many people value their public parks this space could be better used for other purposes such as residential areas for the ever growing population or to develop business and boost economies To what extent do you agree or disagree with this 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...less works we barely could cook for us. Thus we prefer to have fast food at mealtime...
^^^^
Line 5, column 413, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'restaurants'' or 'restaurant's'?
Suggestion: restaurants'; restaurant's
...g habits. Another downside is that many restaurants food processing systems are not hygieni...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1799.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01114206128 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61436009122 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590529247911 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7406942173 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.95 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.95 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247767595661 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787774524056 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500982684641 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165194109308 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0035833879315 0.056905535591 6% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.