In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
Although a certain conclusion cannot be made, in spite of all undeniable merits of working quickly, I firmly concur with the idea that people should work efficiently with the minimum of mistakes. The following paragraphs will substantiate the most outstanding reasons.
First of all, one should take into account this significant fact that if people work swiftly with high rate of making mistake they will need much time to correct their faults. As a matter of fact, it takes more time to check all done works again and again compared to working with lower pace and sufficient accuracy. To illustrate, one needs only to refer to the number of hours needed for modifying previous faulty projects. To demonstrate, most of the authorities all over the world contend that precision and quality of projects are the most important factors in businesses. So they established an experimental program worldwide to see if companies expect their employees to do their project sooner with a myriad mistakes or a bit later but without any mistake. The results are surprising: over 90 percent of business owners prefer to hire efficient people who although spend more time on projects, they attempts their projects with higher efficiency.
In approaching this issue, apart from the fact mentioned above, one should consider another subtle point meticulously that nowadays there is a severe competition between several companies in different industries and businesses. They have to minimize their mistakes to keep in this competition. In fact, numerous mistakes impress on the reputation of the company adversely. The modern world offer abundant examples of companies which due to making mistakes frequently were broken. A noteworthy refreshingly intelligible statistics, revealed by a recent social research conducted in our country, show that the majority of prosperous companies and businesses have some strict bureaucracy about quality of doing projects by their employees. They fine guilty employees severely to enhance their efficiency in upcoming tasks.
Being high efficient in working is vital to every business to survive today’s tough life. Taking all aforementioned arguments into accounts leads us to the conclusion that we should contemplate about how we should fulfil our duties. By working with less mistakes, businessmen not only can save more time and budget but also keep their companies prosperous e
specially in harsh competitions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pooria | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | Somayya | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | Raziya | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | sahar yarahmadi | 70 | view |
- TPO 14 75
- TPO 7 Ecocertification for wood companies 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 70
- A/D: “It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents’ jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents’ job.” 76
- TPO 6 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 907, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'attempt'
Suggestion: attempt
...hough spend more time on projects, they attempts their projects with higher efficiency. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 254, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun mistakes is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ould fulfil our duties. By working with less mistakes, businessmen not only can save...
^^^^
Line 5, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ous e specially in harsh competitions.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, apart from, in conclusion, in fact, as a matter of fact, first of all, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2069.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 381.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43044619423 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88163397839 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61154855643 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2428423083 48.9658058833 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.705882353 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4117647059 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35294117647 5.45110844103 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173668098082 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552553007305 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566712620078 0.0737576698707 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824328489349 0.150856017488 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498191365039 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 11.7677419355 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 10.9000537634 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 86.8835125448 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.