As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In this day and age of the twenty-first century. we are surrounded by all sorts of technological innovations which we often take for granted. We often fail to realize the role played by these utilitarian devices and the drastic change in the quality of life afforded by these innovations. Just less than a century ago, all of these innovations would be unthinkable and their impact unknown. Right from out smartphones which are ubiquitous and have connected us to the invention of the internet which has made us acquire knowledge at the click of a button - all this has certainly made our lives easier. People now do not need to worry about less important issues, as they have already been addressed by technology, and can focus their attention on much more meaningful tasks. Therefore, even though people rely more and more on technology, the ability of humans to think shall not deteriorate but technology shall offer more time and freedom to explore much more important tasks.
Every day we wake up and make our coffee using the coffee machine, have a shower with hot water heated by the geyser, wear clean clothes washed by the washing machine and drive to work in a car with an auto-breaking system to make our ride safer. All of these technological innovations help us to save time and prompt us to focus our jobs and be more productive in our work. Hence, with the increased productivity and effective utilization of both our time and mental resources, we can lead a stress-free life. For example, consider an intelligent scientist who is working to cure Cancer and is very close to coming up with a solution. It is only reasonable that the scientist should focus on the task at hand and not on inconsequential tasks which can easily be taken care of by our technological innovations. Hence, again in this case, we see, that the technological innovations have not hindered the ability of the scientist, and in the bigger picture - the people, but have actually helped us to think clearer.
Furthermore, consider the invention of the aeroplane which again has made our lives so much simpler. We are now able to travel from one part of the world to another and hence get more and more work done. Things which were not available in one part of the world are now easily available due to flight and this is really advantageous. Has the ability of humans to think gone down? Certainly not!
On the other hand, one may argue that because of these very technological advancements, the majority of people have become lazy and think less for themselves. This is certainly an assumption and cannot be taken as the sole truth. Though it is plausible that there may have been some individuals who have become lazy because of the comforts afforded by technology, there have been many others who have utilized the power of technology to solve impactful problems. With every good thing, there are always two sides to it - a good and a bad, and anything in excess is bad. Just as someone once aptly remarked that with great power comes great responsibility, we must again exercise our sound judgement and only use these technological innovations to aid us in performing even greater tasks.
In conclusion, we must realize that though technological innovations have indeed become increasingly commonplace in our lives to help us solve problems, we cannot generalize and make conclusions that the ability of humans to think for themselves shall weaken. As seen in the aforementioned examples, humans can certainly use technology to solve problems and then be able to work on further research to solve problems plaguing humanity. It is just a cycle which shall continue and hence help humanity achieve true progress in all spheres of life.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-22 | pranav_kanth | 50 | view |
2020-01-17 | sefeliz | 58 | view |
2020-01-12 | shuocurity | 66 | view |
2020-01-05 | Mridul | 66 | view |
2019-12-31 | chrissyready | 66 | view |
- “Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 66
- A movie producer sent the following memo to the head of the movie studio.“We need to increase the funding for the movie Working Title by 10% in order to ensure a quality product. As you know, we are working with a first-time director, whose only previou 66
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine."A recent study rating 300 male and female Mentian advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep t 79
- The following appeared in a memo from New Ventures Consulting to the president of HobCo, Inc., a chain of hobby shops."Our team has completed its research on suitable building sites for a new HobCo hobby Shop in the city of Grilldon. We discovered that th 42
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...ay and age of the twenty-first century. we are surrounded by all sorts of technolo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, really, so, then, therefore, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 29.0 14.8657303371 195% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 33.0505617978 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 87.0 58.6224719101 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3105.0 2235.4752809 139% => OK
No of words: 635.0 442.535393258 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88976377953 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.01988110783 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81055986673 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 286.0 215.323595506 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450393700787 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1006.2 704.065955056 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3012107802 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.2 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204110337931 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597427763957 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567278344315 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125051094915 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368148171948 0.0667264976115 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.