Process of science can not be decided whether this is good or bad. Developments from science are used in good ways or bad ways by human. Science is not perfect because people themselves are not perfect. Therefore, we should be very careful about biotechnology but we have to also let scientist be free as much as we can.
Coping human is not realizable. Wars done by artificially made soldiers won't happen. Technologies for coping organs, however, would make us possible not to be old. Researching gene may also help us to get rid of deceases from their children before parents give births to them. Unlike SF movies, it would not be possible to choose their children before they are born. Instead, parents would be certain that they are giving their children opportunities for better life.
In addition, making plastic ,medicine , chemical products and food etc would include biological process. By using biotechnology, we would be able to grow super food. In the future, maybe we can grow corns which is three times bigger than original ones. This would naturally solve problems from lack of food in Africa. Also we would be able to cure untreatable deceases easily with organs which human made. Maybe someday we don't have to worry about lung cancer and heart deceases. All we need would be just changing the bad organ to new one.
Goverment need to get rid of all limitation about biological researches. Money should be spent on not only universities but also on elementary schools. Continuous and high quality researchers have responsibility for the growth of new people. We need to incourage young people to be good scientists.
- Some people think that government should provide education for free on all levels: primary, secondary and tertiary. Others believe that it is the responsibility of individuals to pay for their own tertiary education. Discuss both views and give your opini 56
- Biotechnology companies all over the world are developing different types of genetically modified (GM) crops. However, not enough is known about the effects of these crops on our health and on environment. Inferring with nature in this way should be prohi 61
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that that should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. 67
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 32
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 29, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...er life. In addition, making plastic ,medicine , chemical products and food et...
^^
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... In addition, making plastic ,medicine , chemical products and food etc would in...
^^
Line 5, column 320, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...e problems from lack of food in Africa. Also we would be able to cure untreatable de...
^^^^
Line 5, column 425, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...gans which human made. Maybe someday we dont have to worry about lung cancer and hea...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ust changing the bad organ to new one. Goverment need to get rid of all limita...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97090909091 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68945787844 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603636363636 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.5277313676 49.4020404114 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 65.0952380952 106.682146367 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.0952380952 20.7667163134 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.61904761905 7.06120827912 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119845889648 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0372542361885 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0325005375939 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0775040366407 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315954013477 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.0946893788 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 50.2224549098 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.66 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.