The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The four pie charts demonstrate the proportions of 3 age groups: 0-14 years, 15-29 years and 60 and above years, of Yemeni and Italian population in the year 2000 and their estimation for 2050.
Looking at the population of Yemen, in the year 2000 half of the country population is between 0-14 years of age, which is expected to slump by 13.1% in the year 2050. Conversely, the group of 15-59 aged people whose percentage will increase by 11 % i.e. from 46.3% in 2000 to 57.3% in 2050. Whereas senior citizens (60+ years) proportions are the lowest in 2000 and will remain lowest in 2050, even with a slight increase of 2%.
According to the data of Italian citizens, the oldest age group occupies almost a quarter of the total population in 2000 which will significantly grow by approximately 20% in 2050. While the middle age group, 15-59 years which is the largest portion of population in 2000 at 61.6% will reduce to 46.2% by 2050. However, the percentages of children, 0-14 years are the least in 2000 at 14.3% and will further decrease by 3% in 2050.
Overall, it is clear that the proportions of the youngest age group (14years and below) of both countries will fall by the year 2050, in contrast to the older age groups, 15-59years in Yemen and 60years and above in Italy , which are expected to rise.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-01 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2021-11-01 | ghazaleh Basiri | 87 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | dwi angraeni hatik | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | thi tran | 87 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | pateldhruv1708 | 61 | view |
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree the statement. 89
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 87
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 88
Comments
The essay should be over 5
The essay should be over 5.5. The reasons is:
Unique words percentage: 0.497854077253 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
look, the unique words percentage is: 0.497854077253, it is much lower than the average percentage which is: 0.547539520022
so the e-grader gave it a low mark.
==============
possible reason is that those words like: '0-14 years', '15-29 years' and '60 and above' are repeated.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... in Yemen and 60years and above in Italy , which are expected to rise.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, if, look, whereas, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1084.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65236051502 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50283677895 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497854077253 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 41.8611917532 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.5 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.125 22.9334400587 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187782702035 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100056076751 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0314674601767 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133419686042 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00497865180102 0.0819641961636 6% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 75.88 61.2550243902 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.