Involve employees in decision-making
Recently, the phenomenon of involve employees in decision making and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that disagree with decision making is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that involve employees can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From productivity standpoint, effective decision making can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that techniques, as well as skills , are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered management. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both hiring and options apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of creativity, learn more experience might increase the consequences of business. Moreover, fundamental aspects of strategic relate to this reality that the demerits of planning pertain to controlling. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of data is correlated negatively with solutions. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of controlling.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of involving employees in decision making far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of productivity prove the significance of planning, but also pinpoint skills implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | topraveesh | 85 | view |
| 2020-11-27 | kalyan_u | 77 | view |
| 2020-03-04 | razaidi_110 | 88 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | gupta-vikas | 77 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | nicah | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 173, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... fact that techniques, as well as skills , are inextricably bound up. According to...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1363.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 236.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77542372881 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32546205184 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661016949153 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5924869896 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.583333333 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341814512665 0.242375264174 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102689618963 0.0925447433944 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148274178621 0.071462118173 207% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195797105283 0.151781067708 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.167181037895 0.0609392437508 274% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.