People pursue dangerous activities like skydiving, motorcycle sports, whitewater river rafting etc. Do you support? If yes, why and if not, why?
Recently, the phenomenon of dangerous sports and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that extreme sports are highly rewarding, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that facing up the problems can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From adventures sports standpoint, being keen on exciting sports can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that sporty persons, as well as stressful situations, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered rivalry among sportswomen. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both physical and mental injuries and chances of permanent injuries apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of risk-taking sports, the disturbing body might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of spectators. Moreover fundamental aspects of participants relate to this reality that demerits of boosting Adrenalin pertain to the vigorous workout. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by the prestigious university has asserted that the downside of strenuous exercise is correlated negatively with suffering from serious injuries. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of exciting sports.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that benefits of life-threatening activities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of lucrative sports prove the significance of exciting sports, but also pinpoint developing self-confidence implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-05 | mehdi.mehdi2 | 11 | view |
| 2018-01-16 | Mahdi_Farhani | 11 | view |
| 2018-01-16 | Mahdi_Farhani | 11 | view |
| 2018-01-16 | Mahdi_Farhani | 11 | view |
| 2018-01-16 | Mahdi_Farhani | 11 | view |
- What is the best invention of last 100 years?and explain why? 85
- Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of company. Do you agree or disagree? 80
- What is the best invention of last 100 years?and explain why? 11
- What is the most significant invention to last 100 years; the computer, medicines, the airplane, and explainwhy? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your ownknowledge or experience. 11
- Vegetarianism is more ethical than eating meat.” Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations. 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...atastrophic consequences of spectators. Moreover fundamental aspects of participants rel...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Adrenalin) must be used with a third-person verb: 'pertains'.
Suggestion: pertains
...ity that demerits of boosting Adrenalin pertain to the vigorous workout. As a tangible ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1513.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93333333333 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32766299716 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.690196078431 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3615603707 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.083333333 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0446661966567 0.242375264174 18% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0166397633097 0.0925447433944 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0210656259708 0.071462118173 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0276684787055 0.151781067708 18% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0228235746428 0.0609392437508 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.11 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.37 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.