Do you think consumers should avoid purchase of over packaged products oris it the responsibility of producers to avoid extra packaging of products. Give yor view with any relevant example of your own experience.
Recently, the phenomenon of packaging products and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that packaging of products is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that packaged products can be a plus, and I will analyze throughout this essay.
From a societal standpoint, avoiding extra packaging can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that environmental protections, as well as clean earth, inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered impacts of extra products. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both restricting producers by the government and applying new laws to different companies apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of environmental science, legislating new rules might increase the consequences of the better environment by much more cleaner continents. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of climate change related to this reality that the demerits of rushes pertain to producing too much packaging substances like plastic. As a tangible example, a scientific study undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of plastic is correlated negatively with lack of managing the manufacturers. Hence, it is correct to presume preconceived notion of recycling.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of controlling packaging products far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of such measurements prove the significance of conserving the environment, but also pinpoint golden opportunities implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 132, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'cleaner' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: cleaner
...ences of the better environment by much more cleaner continents. Moreover, the fundamental a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81578947368 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3921546562 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672932330827 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1949366061 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.916666667 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193241019861 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571131069456 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397114473989 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100341524588 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412924081514 0.0609392437508 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.9 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.