‘Tourism is always a force for good which enables people of different countries to
understand each other.’
To what extent do you agree with this idea?
You should give reasons for your answer, and include ideas and examples from your own
knowledge and experience.
Write at least 250 words.
There are several proverbs and quotation that the best way to make people throughout the world more familiar with each other. I believe tourism industry play a vital role in people of different ethnic's perception of each other. In this I am going to explain why.
Firstly, open mindedness could not be possible unless by having a wide perspective of this world. This incident could be met by having travel to other countries frequently. Presence of people of other nations could readily result in either gaining positive morality or injection of that in the community. For instance, people of third could take advantage of culture of modern and developed country and by coming back to their homeland transmit these positive points to other people. Of course, there are negative and hazardous effects that could ruin a society culture, although people are always accustomed to grab useful to grab useful and positive points.
On the other hand, tourism could pave the way for people understanding about other nation history and could also make clear some uncertainty and misunderstanding which other countries have regarding some races. Reportedly, authorities in west tend to make an unfair perception about middle-east countries thanks to their benefits. Accordingly, having a journey to these countries could not only make anything transparent about them, but also would carve an unbelievable memory in tourist minds. Iran is exemplary regarding this issue since it is exhibit and advertised by western country the most unsafe and dangerous country in the sphere, though they forgot this country has set some records in which illustrate Iran is even safer than large number of modern countries.
To conclude, tourism industry has tangible effects on understanding of people. Not only would these effects on could be as positive interaction in culture and morality, but also could make clear a great deal of reality about countries. However, the upsides of tourism outweigh its disadvantage proportionally.
- Many people today are worried about young children using video games What problems might these games cause for children and society as a whole How could these problems be reduced 80
- Having police officers patrolling the streets is often considered an essential way to reduce crime How effective do you think police street patrols are What other ways of reducing crime can you propose 79
- In many countries today there are concerns about the unhealthy lifestyles that people lead What health issues are linked to modern lifestyles What answers to these problems can you suggest 97
- Prison is the only truly effective form of punishment because it separates criminals from society 97
- Tourism is always a force for good which enables people of different countries to understand each other To what extent do you agree with this idea You should give reasons for your answer and include ideas and examples from your own knowledge and experienc 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'ethnics'' or 'ethnic's'?
Suggestion: ethnics'; ethnic's
...lay a vital role in people of different ethnics perception of each other. In this I am ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, so, third, for instance, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1698.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32288401254 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76512129488 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551724137931 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0473886933 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.2 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130043675737 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463371065243 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367962599008 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0807134775873 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478577523137 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.