Professors' appearances on television
The lecturer states that when a professor appears on thte television, there aren’t as many benefits as one could think, neither to the professor sim/herself, nor to the community.
The first point the lecturer makes is that the professors are not likely to gain importance as scholars, like the passage defends. On the contrary, the professors that go to television shows will probably be seen more as entertainers than as educators. Therefore, they will be less likely to get invited to important conferences in their field of stufy, and it may become more difficult for them to raise funds in order to support some research.
Moreover, the lecturer also says that these television appearances will not be good for the public in general, as the passage claims they will. She states when the public watches television, people are not seeking for intelectual substance in the shows, therefore the producers will not allow the professors there to make deep analyzys in a particular subject. They will be allowed to present a brief introduction of what they want to share with the public, something that any reporter would be able to do with some research.
In other words, the lecturer disagrees with the points made in the passage, refering to the professors’ appearance on the television as something that could damage their reputation and not bring any knowledge to the general public.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-13 | himal | view | |
| 2022-12-08 | predatoros | 86 | view |
| 2022-11-18 | rpinisetti8 | 83 | view |
| 2022-11-16 | KnockingOn | 80 | view |
| 2022-11-03 | daddy | 80 | view |
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 30
- Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia. Using an observation-centered approach to studying Tertian culture, he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than 52
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 62
- Professors' appearances on television 80
- According to a new report from the federal government, overall donations of money to nonprofit groups increased last year. Most notably, donations to international aid groupsincreased by 30 percent, followed by donations to environmental groups, which inc 34
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 218, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...vision shows will probably be seen more as entertainers than as educators. Therefo...
^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'watches'' or 'watch's'?
Suggestion: watches'; watch's
...s they will. She states when the public watches television, people are not seeking for ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 222, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...tion and not bring any knowledge to the general public.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, in general, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1170.0 1373.03311258 85% => OK
No of words: 230.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08695652174 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86139812746 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.4602067077 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.25 110.228320801 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.75 21.698381199 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 7.06452816374 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28455119719 0.272083759551 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130049641044 0.0996497079465 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113223702755 0.0662205650399 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202490222213 0.162205337803 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0991962427504 0.0443174109184 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.3589403974 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.8541721854 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.