Nowadays, world is changing quickly, so that sometimes people have to work on many different things in order to deal with these changes. In this regard, leaders play a vital role in people's success owing to the fact that they can lead people to succeed. They can provide a situation in which people can be succeeded. Whether leadership is an inherent ability or it can be learnt is a subject of controversy. A popular belief in this regard is that leadership is a naturally ability, whereas the other group of people believe that it can be learnt and it is not an innate ability. Personally, I agree with the latter idea. In the following lines, I will attempt to support this idea through 2 reasons.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that people can be good leaders by taking psychology courses. Psychology courses can help leaders to get a good realization of people. Today, a lot of things happening around the world. At every moment, the pace of world's changing is increasing which demands people to work together as a team in order to catch up with these changes. In a team, there are often people with wide range of interests, which make them to have different thoughts about something, Hence it may occur some conflicts among members of a group regarding deciding on different issues. Leadership, as a top position in every group, must know how to make a balance between members. They must know that each one of the members of the group how to feel about the decision. By taking courses in the psychology field of study, leaders can be familiar with the emotion of people, so that they will learn how to make a communication with other members in order to involve them in decision making. Thus, leadership is not a inherent ability and can be learned easily by taking some courses in psychology.
The second reason deserves some words here is that leaders can develop their leadership by knowing about their strengths and weaknesses. The journey to leadership is first taking a look at oneself. Leaders are very strong people. Their performance in hardships is better than normal people owing to the fact that they are aware of their own strengths and weaknesses. In any decision making, they will look at themselves at first and think that what they would do if they were people in a same situation. Then they try to improve their strengths and eliminate their weaknesses. If someone knows him/herself well, he/she can be a good leader, otherwise he/she cannot be a good option for leadership.
To put it all in a nutshell, leadership is not a thing that cannot be learnt owing to the fact that by taking some courses in psychology field of study, people can learn how to make a good communication with other people in order to make decision. Besides, people can develop their leadership by improving strengths and eliminating weaknesses.
- TPO-43 - Independent Writing Task Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?-Interrupt and correct the mistake right away-Wa 90
- TPO-25 - Integrated Writing Task In 1938 an archaeologist in Iraq acquired a set of clay jars that had been excavated two years earlier by villagers constructing a railroad line. The vessel was about 2,200 years old. Each clay jay contained a copper cylin 80
- Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 73
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 66
- TPO 35 writing 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...o that sometimes people have to work on many different things in order to deal with these chan...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 463, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('naturally') instead an adjective, or a noun ('ability') instead of another adjective.
...ef in this regard is that leadership is a naturally ability, whereas the other group of people beli...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1030, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ecision making. Thus, leadership is not a inherent ability and can be learned eas...
^
Line 3, column 699, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cannot be a good option for leadership. To put it all in a nutshell, leadership ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to owe'.
Suggestion: to owe
...ip is not a thing that cannot be learnt owing to the fact that by taking some courses...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, hence, if, look, may, regarding, second, so, then, thus, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 15.1003584229 179% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 9.8082437276 224% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 52.1666666667 157% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2368.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 496.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77419354839 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64078118862 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4375 0.524837075471 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 726.3 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.982382633 48.9658058833 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.72 100.406767564 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.84 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44 5.45110844103 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159988753674 0.236089414692 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052623414322 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367054894676 0.0737576698707 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106702017245 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0097703624951 0.0645574589148 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 10.9000537634 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 86.8835125448 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.