People think that children nowadays have more freedom. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is thought that recently, young people are given more freedom than in the past. When considering their rights to make decisions in financial and educational perspectives, I concur with this view, but it is not true for recreation and daily routines.
On the one hand, children have more personal autonomy in some aspects, including finance and study. Firstly, they have more money and are free to decide how to spend it. This freedom stems from the increasing affluence in an average family, and therefore, parents give them more allowance monthly than in the past, so they can buy toys, clothes or whatever they like without being controlled. Secondly, children are also less confined to choose majors. While young people were normally forced to learn subjects which could widen their career prospects such as technology or engineering, children in modern life own a more powerful voice and have the freedom to pursue their interest even when it is artistic or vocational.
On the other hand, some aspects show a rising restriction on children. The most obvious one is recreational activities. Youngsters are no longer permitted to participate in leisure activities freely but are confined to a life of indoor supervision. This results from the parental fears of crime, bullying and road accidents, and consequently, parents tend to excessively protect their offspring. Furthermore, each couple has fewer children so they try to put their offspring under surveillance, culminating in the loss of freedom in their daily life. For instance, many of them are banned from walking to school unaccompanied or sleeping over at friends’ houses.
In conclusion, I accept that children currently have more independence to either buy whatever they want or choose their study path, but in several aspects such as spending free time or organizing their life, they are more controlled.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Adilrahi | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | msolanki | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | sepide1367 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | martinestefan | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | kiana | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 73
- The table blow gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 47
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The maps show the library five years ago and now 54
- Topic The graph below shows the number of inquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2582781457 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85382058249 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612582781457 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.1670169299 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.428571429 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9285714286 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175439555715 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620327147448 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562726488713 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109768246457 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054470434539 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.