The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist. “Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by their own biological parents. However, my recent interviews with children living in the group of islands that includes Tertia show that these children spend much more time talking about their biological parents than about other adults in the village. This research of mine proves that Dr. Field’s conclusion about Tertian village culture is invalid and thus that the observation-centered approach to studying cultures is invalid as well. The interview-centered method that my team of graduate students is currently using in Tertia will establish a much more accurate understanding of child-rearing traditions there and in other island cultures.” Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The Authors conclusion from his article invalidates the approach of Dr fields in the studies of the Terran culture. This conclusion is based on his interviewbased approach of the children of the community. However, for his recommended to be accepted, three evidences are to be provided.
Firstly, the author assumes that the children must have been groomed by their parent because they usually speak about them. This may possibly be wrong. Perhaps these stories may just be stories told by the Elderly ones to the children to satisfy thier inquisitiveness towards knowing their parents. It may be a Legend. There are no further evidences to prove that these stories were actually told directly by their parents. If the above senario is merited, it therefore significantly weakenes the author's conclusion.
Secondly, the interviewed base approach may not necessarily comprehensively capture the entire culture of the terran community. From the evidences provided by the Author, it is assumed that only the children who were interviewed provided the comprehensive view of the culture of the terrane community. For example. The culture of a particular community is possibly best told by the aged and elderly ones of these community. The holding precepts and chronolgy of the community is best told by those who have lived long and more experinced in the community. The above assertions may weaken the author's conclusion.
Furthermore, there are possibly other research based approach that gives an indept understanding of the culture of the terran people other than the interview based method. For example, Artifacts, marriage traditions, history books and real time study of these people may go along way in capturing the intrinsic aspect of the terran culture.
In conclusion, the evidences provided by the author are significantly weakened and thus further evidence are needed for the authors recommendation to be accepted.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-01 | Sophy@ | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Sophy@ | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | dhruv7315 | 77 | view |
| 2023-08-19 | Mayuresh08 | 64 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Dinesh4518 | 85 | view |
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 16
- The best way to teach a person is to praise the person s positive actions and ignore negative actions Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted resul 58
- Issue Topic The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The Authors conclusion from his article invalidates the approa...
^^
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...The Authors conclusion from his article invalidates the approach of Dr fields in...
^^
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommended being'.
Suggestion: recommended being
...dren of the community. However, for his recommended to be accepted, three evidences are to be pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed, three evidences are to be provided. Firstly, the author assumes that the chi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: MIGHT_PERHAPS[1]
Message: Use simply 'may', 'possibly'.
Suggestion: may; possibly
...use they usually speak about them. This may possibly be wrong. Perhaps these stories may jus...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'may'.
Suggestion: may
...use they usually speak about them. This may possibly be wrong. Perhaps these stories may jus...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... stories may just be stories told by the Elderly ones to the children to satisfy ...
^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...It may be a Legend. There are no further evidences to prove that these stories w...
^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Legend. There are no further evidences to prove that these stories were actuall...
^^
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...it therefore significantly weakenes the authors conclusion. Secondly, the interviewe...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 557, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...g and more experinced in the community. The above assertions may weaken the authors...
^^^
Line 5, column 593, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ty. The above assertions may weaken the authors conclusion. Furthermore, there are p...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the interview based method. For example, Artifacts, marriage traditions, history ...
^^
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Artifacts, marriage traditions, history books and real time study of these peopl...
^^
Line 9, column 125, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...hus further evidence are needed for the authors recommendation to be accepted.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 55.5748502994 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 16.3942115768 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 2260.96107784 72% => OK
No of words: 303.0 441.139720559 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38943894389 5.12650576532 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.56307096286 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97384826214 2.78398813304 107% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 204.123752495 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491749174917 0.468620217663 105% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 705.55239521 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.2852664773 57.8364921388 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0588235294 119.503703932 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8235294118 23.324526521 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 5.70786347227 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 15.0 5.25449101796 285% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0715060479749 0.218282227539 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0237716436901 0.0743258471296 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377196526192 0.0701772020484 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0426727861407 0.128457276422 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416768245241 0.0628817314937 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.3799401198 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.3550499002 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.5979740519 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 98.500998004 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 12.3882235529 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The Authors conclusion from his article invalidates the approa...
^^
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...The Authors conclusion from his article invalidates the approach of Dr fields in...
^^
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommended being'.
Suggestion: recommended being
...dren of the community. However, for his recommended to be accepted, three evidences are to be pro...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed, three evidences are to be provided. Firstly, the author assumes that the chi...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: MIGHT_PERHAPS[1]
Message: Use simply 'may', 'possibly'.
Suggestion: may; possibly
...use they usually speak about them. This may possibly be wrong. Perhaps these stories may jus...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'may'.
Suggestion: may
...use they usually speak about them. This may possibly be wrong. Perhaps these stories may jus...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... stories may just be stories told by the Elderly ones to the children to satisfy ...
^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...It may be a Legend. There are no further evidences to prove that these stories w...
^^
Line 3, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Legend. There are no further evidences to prove that these stories were actuall...
^^
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...it therefore significantly weakenes the authors conclusion. Secondly, the interviewe...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 557, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...g and more experinced in the community. The above assertions may weaken the authors...
^^^
Line 5, column 593, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ty. The above assertions may weaken the authors conclusion. Furthermore, there are p...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 185, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the interview based method. For example, Artifacts, marriage traditions, history ...
^^
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Artifacts, marriage traditions, history books and real time study of these peopl...
^^
Line 9, column 125, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...hus further evidence are needed for the authors recommendation to be accepted.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.9520958084 54% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 11.1786427146 45% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 55.5748502994 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 16.3942115768 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 2260.96107784 72% => OK
No of words: 303.0 441.139720559 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38943894389 5.12650576532 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.56307096286 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97384826214 2.78398813304 107% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 204.123752495 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491749174917 0.468620217663 105% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 705.55239521 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.2852664773 57.8364921388 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0588235294 119.503703932 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8235294118 23.324526521 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 5.70786347227 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 15.0 5.25449101796 285% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0715060479749 0.218282227539 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0237716436901 0.0743258471296 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377196526192 0.0701772020484 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0426727861407 0.128457276422 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0416768245241 0.0628817314937 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.3799401198 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.3550499002 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.5979740519 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.32208582834 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 98.500998004 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 12.3882235529 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.