The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment complex to its manager.
"One month ago, all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towers complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to one-third of what it used to be. Although actual readings of water usage before and after the adjustment are not yet available, the change will obviously result in a considerable savings for Sunnyside Corporation, since the corporation must pay for water each month. Except for a few complaints about low water pressure, no problems with showers have been reported since the adjustment. I predict that modifying showerheads to restrict water flow throughout all twelve buildings in the Sunnyside Towers complex will increase our profits even more dramatically."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the prediction and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the prediction.
The above stated excerpt states the situation raised after the reduction of maximum water flow of showerheads to one third of the original quantity. According to the resident of the Sunnyside towers apartment complex, from the letter for its manager, the current situation is stated to be optimal. Hence, there is a further suggestion of implementing the same for all the twelve buildings in the Sunnyside towers complex which shall increase the profits even more.
In this scenario, there is no actual proof of whatsoever the data we may talk about. We don’t have statistical data regarding the usage of water before and after the restriction of the maxima for the showerheads. Hence, the entire point is questionable. Even if we consider that the given situation is true there are possibilities that during that time people actually might have stopped using the shower head, or they might not be in town or living at home for that matter. All this prevents them from facing any issues related to showerheads at the very first. We can state that the owner of the apartment is quite eager to declare the conclusions. But in such scenarios, a longer period of time shall be considered.
There have been only few complaints suggests the owner. However, this is the scenario with just the first three buildings. While transforming from small scale to large scale one must consider that even the difficulties and issues faced are being transformed. Here in the initial phase, there is probability of the users being co-operative and harmonious. But this may not be the case every other time. There may be a situation where other residents of the apartments may create a bigger fuss about the restriction of flow of the showerheads to one third of the original value.
The motive behind reducing the flow is to be considered. In the current times, with the evolution of this planet, we are also experiencing its deterioration. On one hand there might be blossoms, however on the other hand we can see the world decay. Water is a precious resource for survival in this universe. We need to preserve our available resources and help in building a sustainable environment.
With water flow cut down to one-third, the entire sunnyside towers apartment will be helping to provide for those who aren’t lucky enough to use water in their day to day lives. However, none of it is mentioned in the given excerpt. Hence it is not very sure that the restriction of maximum water flow for showerheads is truly and solely a benefit to the sunnyside towers apartment or even to the mother nature.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-27 | thevamsi5932 | 58 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | sairaghu96 | 58 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | diya | 60 | view |
| 2023-07-13 | shubham1102 | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jonginn | 65 | view |
- Many of the medical problems that people are experiencing in today s world are due to the fact that we have a very sedentary lifestyle 78
- Claim Young people s tendency to make extensive use of portable devices like smartphones and tablets has hurt their development of social skills Reason These devices encourage users to form artificial personalities and relationships online rather than ful 54
- Claim Young people s tendency to make extensive use of portable devices like smartphones and tablets has hurt their development of social skills Reason These devices encourage users to form artificial personalities and relationships online rather than ful 66
- College students should be encouraged to pursue subjects that interest them rather than the courses that seem most likely to lead to jobs Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 80
- Throughout the country last year as more and more children below the age of nine participated in youth league sports over 40 000 of these young players suffered injuries When interviewed for a recent study youth league soccer players in several major citi 75
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 684, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...usions. But in such scenarios, a longer period of time shall be considered. There have been ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...f it is mentioned in the given excerpt. Hence it is not very sure that the restrictio...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, regarding, so, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.6327345309 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 28.8173652695 101% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 55.5748502994 113% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2148.0 2260.96107784 95% => OK
No of words: 440.0 441.139720559 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88181818182 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72999485363 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 204.123752495 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495454545455 0.468620217663 106% => OK
syllable_count: 687.6 705.55239521 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.22255489022 166% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 19.7664670659 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.8170960169 57.8364921388 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5 119.503703932 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 23.324526521 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.70786347227 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.20758483034 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286033936683 0.218282227539 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696282409723 0.0743258471296 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781114345916 0.0701772020484 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169676125214 0.128457276422 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108463193166 0.0628817314937 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.3799401198 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.3550499002 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.5979740519 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 98.500998004 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 684, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...usions. But in such scenarios, a longer period of time shall be considered. There have been ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...f it is mentioned in the given excerpt. Hence it is not very sure that the restrictio...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, regarding, so, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.6327345309 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 11.1786427146 89% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 28.8173652695 101% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 55.5748502994 113% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2148.0 2260.96107784 95% => OK
No of words: 440.0 441.139720559 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88181818182 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72999485363 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 204.123752495 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495454545455 0.468620217663 106% => OK
syllable_count: 687.6 705.55239521 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.22255489022 166% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 19.7664670659 121% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.8170960169 57.8364921388 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.5 119.503703932 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 23.324526521 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.70786347227 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.20758483034 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286033936683 0.218282227539 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696282409723 0.0743258471296 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781114345916 0.0701772020484 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169676125214 0.128457276422 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108463193166 0.0628817314937 172% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.3799401198 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.3550499002 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.5979740519 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 98.500998004 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.