The following is a letter that recently appeared in the Oak City Gazette, a local newspaper.
"The primary function of the Committee for a Better Oak City is to advise the city government on how to make the best use of the city's limited budget. However, at some of our recent meetings we failed to make important decisions because of the foolish objections raised by committee members who are not even residents of Oak City. People who work in Oak City but who live elsewhere cannot fully understand the business and politics of the city. After all, only Oak City residents pay city taxes, and therefore only residents understand how that money could best be used to improve the city. We recommend, then, that the Committee for a Better Oak City vote to restrict its membership to city residents only. We predict that, without the interference of non-residents, the committee will be able to make Oak City a better place in which to live and work."
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
Interference is a major factor that affects the ability to make crucial decisions for important matters. The recommendation in this letter to restrict the membership pf the committee for a Better Oak City is good as it may yiel the desired effects. However, for this recommendation to be critically evaluated certain question have to be answered; the answers to this question would determine if recommendation is plausible.
Are the current residents of Oak City interested in the committee membership? This is a very crucial to answer before advertisement is been made calling for membership. Residents of the city must have the interest to contribute as members; if they are forced they would make wrong decisions and argue with one another. This would result is the same outcome as is currently seen with non-residents. A positive answer to the question assures the committee that citizens who are passionate about oak city would be participating in makin decisions.
In addition to interest, do current residents of oak city have the skills and knowledge sufficient to make siginificant contributions and recommendations? Do they have good interpersonal relationships and are there sufficiently educated to serve on the committee? This question analyses the suitablility of residence to serve as members of the committee. It as assesses their capacity to function effectively on the committee. Residents who are not abreast on current market trend and economic trends would make facile contributions on how to allocate the available resources based on the limited budget, this defeats the overall purpose of the committee.
Also, what were the ‘foolish objections’ made the current non-residents members of the committee? By who’s opinion are these objections considered inadequate? It is important to consider the validity of the contributions made my non-residents because they stand to have experiences from their various cities of residents which may be beneficial in considering all possibilities in arriving at committee desicion. If the validity if their contributions are ascertained they should be considered and members of the committee.
In conclusion, this are a few of the questions to be considered by the committee before accepting the recommendation stated in the Oak City Gazette. A positive response to the question signifies a plausibility of the recommendation and certainty of the prediction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-01 | Sagar1234567890 | 74 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | TiOluwani97 | 58 | view |
| 2022-08-28 | nipuntestbig | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-05 | Vincent Samuel | 60 | view |
| 2022-07-05 | Naveena0 | 58 | view |
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 50
- Scientists and other researchers should focus their research on areas that are likely to benefit the greatest number of people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 66
- The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyze the trends of its youth Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 66
- Several recent studies have shown a link between health and stair usage One recently completed study shows that people who live in stairs only apartment buildings that is buildings without elevators live an average of three years longer than do people who 88
- Communal online encyclopedias represent one of the latest resources to be found on the Internet They are in many respects like traditional printed encyclopedias collections of articles on various subjects What is specific to these online encyclopedias how 87
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he ‘foolish objections’ made the current non-residents members of the committee? ...
^^
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: WHOS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whose'?
Suggestion: whose
...-residents members of the committee? By who’s opinion are these objections considered...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: WHOS_NN[4]
Message: Did you mean 'whose opinion'?
Suggestion: whose opinion
...-residents members of the committee? By who’s opinion are these objections considered inadequ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s which may be beneficial in considering all possibilities in arriving at committ...
^^
Line 7, column 432, Rule ID: IF_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
... at committee desicion. If the validity if their contributions are ascertained the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.6327345309 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 55.5748502994 95% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2062.0 2260.96107784 91% => OK
No of words: 374.0 441.139720559 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51336898396 5.12650576532 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39910985146 2.78398813304 122% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 204.123752495 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467914438503 0.468620217663 100% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 705.55239521 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59920159681 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.1328429182 57.8364921388 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.526315789 119.503703932 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6842105263 23.324526521 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.10526315789 5.70786347227 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.20758483034 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215164679822 0.218282227539 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762418499192 0.0743258471296 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846456049868 0.0701772020484 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133058221045 0.128457276422 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429338940442 0.0628817314937 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.3799401198 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 48.3550499002 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.5979740519 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.32208582834 109% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 98.500998004 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 12.3882235529 73% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he ‘foolish objections’ made the current non-residents members of the committee? ...
^^
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: WHOS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whose'?
Suggestion: whose
...-residents members of the committee? By who’s opinion are these objections considered...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: WHOS_NN[4]
Message: Did you mean 'whose opinion'?
Suggestion: whose opinion
...-residents members of the committee? By who’s opinion are these objections considered inadequ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s which may be beneficial in considering all possibilities in arriving at committ...
^^
Line 7, column 432, Rule ID: IF_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
... at committee desicion. If the validity if their contributions are ascertained the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.6327345309 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 55.5748502994 95% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2062.0 2260.96107784 91% => OK
No of words: 374.0 441.139720559 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51336898396 5.12650576532 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39910985146 2.78398813304 122% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 204.123752495 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467914438503 0.468620217663 100% => OK
syllable_count: 664.2 705.55239521 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59920159681 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.1328429182 57.8364921388 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.526315789 119.503703932 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6842105263 23.324526521 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.10526315789 5.70786347227 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.20758483034 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215164679822 0.218282227539 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762418499192 0.0743258471296 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846456049868 0.0701772020484 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133058221045 0.128457276422 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429338940442 0.0628817314937 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.3799401198 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 48.3550499002 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.5979740519 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.32208582834 109% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 98.500998004 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 12.3882235529 73% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.