It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position
According to the dictionary, a hero is someone with an established moral conduct and stance which has been judged to be exemplary and worth emulating for the ultimate good of the society. Based on this definition, this claim is cannot be judged to be inaccurate because in most modern society, it is difficult to identify a person with character that is worth emulating. This purpose of this response is to support the stated claim and provide backing examples.
With the advent of technology it is now possible to trace the true intentions of aspiring heroes; based on their past social interactions and public statements. This is particularly made possible through the advent of social media. For instance, through these internet platforms selfish and contemptible statements made by a political moralist, a freedom fighter, are readily unearthed. This causes him to appear fake in the eyes of the society that places him on a high moral standard.
Secondly, due to the advent of the internet it is relative easier to share public opinions. Opinions that contrast put the society in a moral dilemma on evaluating the stance of respected people. The What has been strongly established as the truth in times past is now relative because the society now has access to a variety of opinions and can consider stances from various perspective. As such, these societies, being able to think for themselves, remove heroes from the high pedestal they put them on.
On contrary, it is still possible for sovieties to regard a feew living people as heroes due to their outstanding contributions in such societies. For example, Nobel Peace Prize has been awarded to people who have contributed immensely to improving living conditions and fighting for human rights of their people in a bid to promote peaceful living. A few recipients of this award have been considered as heroes in their respective communities. This, although opposing the claim, is countered by the realizations most of recipients have be judged to have selfish interests. This particularly causes yearly contentions on the validity of recipients of this award, therefore implying that he society is gradually arriving at a point where no one is regarded as a hero.
In conclusion, the claim rightfully states that the society no longer regard any living person as a heros. This is because, with the advent of technology, the truth is now relative and it is now easier to recognize individuals for who they truly are.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | TiOluwani97 | 77 | view |
- The following appeared in a recommendation from the planning department of the city of Transopolis Ten years ago as part of a comprehensive urban renewal program the city of Transopolis adapted for industrial use a large area of severely substandard housi 73
- It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compel 77
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting you 50
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 50
- Claim Young people s tendency to make extensive use of portable devices like smartphones and tablets has hurt their development of social skills Reason These devices encourage users to form artificial personalities and relationships online rather than ful 81
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this internet' or ''?
Suggestion: this internet;
... of social media. For instance, through these internet platforms selfish and contemptible stat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 514, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the recipients') or simply say ''most recipients''.
Suggestion: most of the recipients; most recipients
...claim, is countered by the realizations most of recipients have be judged to have selfish interest...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 538, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...he realizations most of recipients have be judged to have selfish interests. This ...
^^
Line 9, column 99, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a hero' or simply 'heros'?
Suggestion: a hero; heros
...y no longer regard any living person as a heros. This is because, with the advent of te...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.6327345309 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.9520958084 15% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 28.8173652695 115% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 55.5748502994 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 16.3942115768 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2081.0 2260.96107784 92% => OK
No of words: 410.0 441.139720559 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0756097561 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8484432226 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 204.123752495 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.468620217663 107% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 705.55239521 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.96107784431 181% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1462687506 57.8364921388 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.611111111 119.503703932 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 23.324526521 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94444444444 5.70786347227 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.20758483034 171% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193370483335 0.218282227539 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619511695467 0.0743258471296 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498341474876 0.0701772020484 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108497601084 0.128457276422 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465816559371 0.0628817314937 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.3799401198 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.3550499002 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.32208582834 112% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 98.500998004 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 12.3882235529 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this internet' or ''?
Suggestion: this internet;
... of social media. For instance, through these internet platforms selfish and contemptible stat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 514, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the recipients') or simply say ''most recipients''.
Suggestion: most of the recipients; most recipients
...claim, is countered by the realizations most of recipients have be judged to have selfish interest...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 538, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...he realizations most of recipients have be judged to have selfish interests. This ...
^^
Line 9, column 99, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a hero' or simply 'heros'?
Suggestion: a hero; heros
...y no longer regard any living person as a heros. This is because, with the advent of te...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.6327345309 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.9520958084 15% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 28.8173652695 115% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 55.5748502994 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 16.3942115768 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2081.0 2260.96107784 92% => OK
No of words: 410.0 441.139720559 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0756097561 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8484432226 2.78398813304 102% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 204.123752495 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.468620217663 107% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 705.55239521 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.96107784431 181% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.22255489022 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1462687506 57.8364921388 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.611111111 119.503703932 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 23.324526521 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94444444444 5.70786347227 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.20758483034 171% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193370483335 0.218282227539 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619511695467 0.0743258471296 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498341474876 0.0701772020484 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108497601084 0.128457276422 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465816559371 0.0628817314937 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.3799401198 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.3550499002 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.5979740519 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.32208582834 112% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 98.500998004 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 12.3882235529 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.