"The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company:
"According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actually increased during the past year. Clearly, the contents of these reviews are not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not with the quality of our movies but with the public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. Super Screen should therefore allocate a greater share of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising."" -
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be addressed in order to decide whether the conclusion and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to the questions would help to evaluate the conclusion.
In the memo from advertising director of Super Screen Production Company, the advertising director suggest to increase the marketing budget of movie in order to reach it's audience. While suggesting, director lacks to provide substantail resoning and makes the argument dubious.
Initially, according to report there was fall in viewers than any other year. This might be questionable about the degree of accuracy of those reports. Also, this requires detailed analysis of report to substantiate the accuracy.
Then the reviewers are being mostly positive about the movies made by Super Screen Production Company compared to earlier times. This casts doubt on quality of contrasting movies produced over those years.
The quality of movies is touted to be good. Despite that quality stated by director, audience are unable to discern those movies produced by Super Screen Production Company from other movies. This casts doubt on tranparency on movie's quality which is delivered.
As the decision of incresing budget needs further detailed analysis and justification of reports to be judged upon.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-11 | thinker3000 | 33 | view |
- Claim: An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action.Reason: When assessing the morality of an action, the results of an action are more important than the in 33
- Claim: An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action.Reason: When assessing the morality of an action, the results of the action are more important than the i 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?LOYALTY IS THE MOST IMPORTANT QUALITY IN MAKING FRIEND 70
- Technology, while apparently aimed to simplify our lives, only makes our lives more complicated.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In dev 33
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a local newspaper in Masontown:“If we want to save money on municipal garbage disposal fees, we need to encourage our residents to recycle more. Late last year, our neighboring town, Hayesworth, passed 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 173, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "requires detailed" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'detailing' or 'to be detailed'.
Suggestion: detailing; to be detailed
...y of those reports. Also, this requires detailed analysis of report to substantiate the ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.6327345309 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 12.9520958084 8% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 11.1786427146 18% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 13.6137724551 15% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 28.8173652695 31% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 55.5748502994 61% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 16.3942115768 43% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 947.0 2260.96107784 42% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 169.0 441.139720559 38% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60355029586 5.12650576532 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 4.56307096286 79% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69340636923 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 204.123752495 49% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597633136095 0.468620217663 128% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 705.55239521 42% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 19.7664670659 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 22.8473053892 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3455364454 57.8364921388 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0909090909 119.503703932 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3636363636 23.324526521 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.27272727273 5.70786347227 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315693912955 0.218282227539 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107466422898 0.0743258471296 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116509458644 0.0701772020484 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158539477439 0.128457276422 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107261727067 0.0628817314937 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.3799401198 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.3550499002 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.5979740519 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.32208582834 115% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 98.500998004 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 12.3882235529 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.1389221557 72% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.