Some people marry shortly after finishing college. Others prefer to focus on their carriers first and wait until later to get married. Which of these situations do you think is better?
It's a common debatable topic about when to get married. It varies from person to person. Personally, I think that, focusing on carrier is more important than getting married at ealiest. There are some resons behind this choice which are elaborated in the subsequnt paragraphs.
Being in a relationship utilizes more time of your life to spend with your partner. This would lead to less time devoted in building a sustainable carrier. This thing I got to know by watching living example on television. A couple from New York City, in their teenage period got married. They lived seperately from their parents along with their newborn baby. The couple find it difficult to survive in this world because of low payscale jobs. Even their daily food necessities wasn't catered sometimes. This example shows, if this couple would have had sustainable carrier they could have ended up getting paid better to fulfill their daily necessities. So, carrier should be prioritized over getting married.
From time to time, I've seen several examples in Indian society about getting married before flourishing in their carrier. These marriages are sustainable but they force to deviate the preset goals. Most of these people have certain aim/goal in their life. They pursue this goal tenaciously. But, the early marriage forces them to change their goals; these people will now have common goals in their life with their partner. This divergence will lead to regretting on the goals which were cast-off by the marriage. Marriage changes the priorities of the people.
In conclusion, marriage before carrier will lead to some financial difficulties, sacrifing of personal goals which might end up in getting frustration. To avoid this, carrier must be prioritised over marriage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-27 | thinker3000 | 60 | view |
- SuperCorp recently moved its headquarters to Corporateville. The recent surge in the number of homeowners in Corporateville proves that Corporateville is a superior place to live than Middlesburg, the home of SuperCorp's original headquarters. Moreov 63
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Computers and the internet help to make school assignments faster and easier to complete 80
- Some people marry shortly after finishing college. Others prefer to focus on their carriers first and wait until later to get married. Which of these situations do you think is better? 60
- "The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company:"According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies 33
- Claim: An action is morally correct if the amount of good that results from the action is greater than the amount of bad that results from the action.Reason: When assessing the morality of an action, the results of the action are more important than the i 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
Its a common debatable topic about when to ...
^^^
Line 5, column 480, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...jobs. Even their daily food necessities wasnt catered sometimes. This example shows, ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 540, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had had'?
Suggestion: had had
...mes. This example shows, if this couple would have had sustainable carrier they could have end...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 20, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I've
...etting married. From time to time, Ive seen several examples in Indian society...
^^^
Line 9, column 170, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'deviating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: deviating
...arriages are sustainable but they force to deviate the preset goals. Most of these people ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 13.8261648746 7% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1977.66487455 75% => OK
No of words: 284.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25704225352 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58268107198 2.67179642975 97% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 212.727598566 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588028169014 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.1344086022 60% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8446443299 48.9658058833 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 67.8636363636 100.406767564 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.9090909091 20.6045352989 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.59090909091 5.45110844103 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.88709677419 286% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20396018521 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582567917837 0.076458572812 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488478580621 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13380524627 0.150856017488 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282853931853 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.3 58.1214874552 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.1575268817 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.34 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 86.8835125448 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.0537634409 68% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.