An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid

Essay topics:

An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be paid subsidies for farming the new variety of millet. Since millet is already a staple food in Tagus, people will readily adopt the new variety. To combat vitamin A deficiency, the government of Tagus should do everything it can to promote this new type of millet.

Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.

The results of the recommendation given above depend on the specific situation in the nation of Tagus, and we cannot make blanket predictions about the same. The predicted result is, of course, that the Vitamin A deficiency among the people of Tagus will greatly reduce as a result of the availability of this new variety of millet.

The first, and most important question that needs to be answered is the cost of this millet to consumers. Even though it has been stated that the farmers will be given subsidies, this recommendation does not state anything about the consumers themselves. Should the millet be sold at a higher rate by farmers, the people of Tagus may not be ready to adopt the new variety. This depends on whether or not subsidising the cost to the consumer is considered a part of what the government of Tagus can do to promote this millet. It might also be difficult for the government to do so, since the nation is already impoverished, and further subsidies might hurt the economy.

Should the millets be subsidised to consumers, and also marketed well, the people of Tagus should be able to adopt this new variety. However, we also need to consider other cultural factors. For instance, if the people are largely resistant to change, it might take longer for them to come around to this new crop. It also raises the question of what exactly their relationship with the government is like. If the people are already suspicious of the government due to their past actions, they understandably would be hesitant to try out something on their recommendation.

Another important factor to consider is access to people. The recommendation states that millet is a staple food in Tagus. However, it is certainly possible that even ordinary millet is out of reach for the most impoverished people in the country (in terms of cost). In such cases, the government would need to subsidise this new millet beyond even what ordinary millet costs, in order to allow these people to consume it. Again, this brings the feasibility of such a scheme into consideration. It may not be feasible to do this in an already impoverished country.

Thus, there are a multitude of questions that need to be answered and taken into consideration before making the assumption that this would automatically resolve the Vitamin A deficiency in Tagus. Such schemes tend to depend on the current economic and political system in that region.

Votes
Average: 7.4 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-20 Dinesh4518 63 view
2023-08-11 Nowshin Tabassum 69 view
2023-07-21 Gnyana 68 view
2023-07-20 Prasad002 59 view
2023-07-08 tanvik21 74 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ability of this new variety of millet. The first, and most important question that...
^^^
Line 2, column 389, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
... adopt the new variety. This depends on whether or not subsidising the cost to the consumer is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, so, thus, well, for instance, of course, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.6327345309 117% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.9520958084 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 28.8173652695 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 55.5748502994 124% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 16.3942115768 98% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2021.0 2260.96107784 89% => OK
No of words: 413.0 441.139720559 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89346246973 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.56307096286 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82025683035 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 204.123752495 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476997578692 0.468620217663 102% => OK
syllable_count: 642.6 705.55239521 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 4.96107784431 222% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4446618999 57.8364921388 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.05 119.503703932 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.65 23.324526521 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15 5.70786347227 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346512675749 0.218282227539 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102317270208 0.0743258471296 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779653142898 0.0701772020484 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174390886636 0.128457276422 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0804640640602 0.0628817314937 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.3799401198 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.3550499002 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.5979740519 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.32208582834 96% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 98.500998004 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.5 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 413 350
No. of Characters: 1972 1500
No. of Different Words: 191 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.508 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.775 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.751 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 141 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 95 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 63 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 45 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.65 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.094 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.296 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.511 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.065 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5