Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered
Here the author suggest that the government should not provide inoculations against cow flu as there is small possibility of death of the person who takes it. The author has not conisdered all the aspects before suggesting the idea. The argument lies on series of assumptions which are unpersuasive and illogical. A few key factors to prove it are:
First, the author mentions that there is a small possibility of death due to inoculations against cow flu. But the author has not mention how many people died due to inoculations, futhermore it is also not mention that, was the death due to inoculations alone or due to no other reason is involved. Unless, the author provides us with facts and figures about the death count it would be illogical to assume that the death has been caused due to inoculations.
Secondly, the author mentions that many lives could be save if inoculations against cow flu is given. If the disease is spread to a larger area then it would be difficult to contain it. As the disease is flu it could be easily transfered from one person to other by different medium like, air, water, touch, and many more. So, it is very important to have a routine check up of the people where the disease was detected. It might happen that if there is no routine check up then the disease could spread to larger part and i would be more difficult to contain it.
Thirdly, by permiting routine inoculations in the affected area the government would save the money. As the people in the contain area would be small so, to provide them with medicine would cost the government less money then providing medicine to a larger population. The government should also consider the cost before denying routine
inoculations. In conclusion, before denying the permit the government should look at all the aforementioned discussion. They should do proper analyses before coming to a final state. If the government does not take a proper decission now, the flu can could be harmful for the people and many people could die from it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-29 | dkim1206 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | wcfr | 60 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | riyarmy | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | Nowshin Tabassum | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Mizanur_Rahman | 55 | view |
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 50
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds 50
- Claim When planning courses educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students Reason Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying Write a response in which you discuss the extent 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers 50
- The following appeared in a magazine article about planning for retirement Clearview should be a top choice for anyone seeking a place to retire because it has spectacular natural beauty and a consistent climate Another advantage is that housing costs in 58
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 6 2
No. of Sentences: 19 15
No. of Words: 353 350
No. of Characters: 1642 1500
No. of Different Words: 157 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.335 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.652 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.618 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 111 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 73 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 47 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 35 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.579 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.561 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.579 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.327 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.564 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.127 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 345, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...llogical. A few key factors to prove it are: First, the author mentions that there ...
^^^
Line 1, column 480, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'mentioned'.
Suggestion: mentioned
...against cow flu. But the author has not mention how many people died due to inoculation...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 911, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... inoculations against cow flu is given. If the disease is spread to a larger area ...
^^
Line 1, column 1332, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...disease could spread to larger part and i would be more difficult to contain it. ...
^
Line 1, column 1491, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... would save the money. As the people in the contain area would be small so, to provide them...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1594, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...ne would cost the government less money then providing medicine to a larger populati...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.6327345309 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.9520958084 131% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 11.1786427146 63% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 28.8173652695 73% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 55.5748502994 77% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 2260.96107784 74% => OK
No of words: 353.0 441.139720559 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74220963173 5.12650576532 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66949034217 2.78398813304 96% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 204.123752495 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450424929178 0.468620217663 96% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 705.55239521 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8758320532 57.8364921388 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4705882353 119.503703932 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7647058824 23.324526521 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.70786347227 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 5.15768463074 19% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308566861581 0.218282227539 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103401361618 0.0743258471296 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799673178674 0.0701772020484 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308566861581 0.128457276422 240% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0628817314937 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.3799401198 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.3550499002 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.5979740519 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.32208582834 86% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 98.500998004 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 12.3882235529 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.9071856287 84% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.