The argument suggest that the late-night news program should restore the time devoted to wearther and local news to its former lever so as to attract more views to the program and to avoid losing any further advertising revenues. The argument seems to be reasonable at the first glance, but it may turn out to be rather unperswasive after further discussion. In of to emulate the advice, more additional evidence is needed.
The fist piece of evidence which may help us to emulate the advice is about wheter the increasing rate of complaints about the coverage of weather and local news to the sum of complains received from views are accompanied by a deceascing number of viewers. The arguor assumes that the two phenomenon will necessar concur. But it's possible that the first one occurs without the second one, for more audiences who are interested in national news are attected, and they make less complaints.
The second piece of evidence we need in order to fully emulate the argument involves the exact reason for local companies to cancell they their cooperation with the program. Based on the fact that the companies made their decision after the change of contents of the program, the author asumes there be a caulsal relationship between them. And this's not necessarily right, the mere sequence of events can't give strong support to the conclusion. As the enterprices may curtail their advertising spend because of internal reasons, for instance financial difficulties, changes of development stratages and stuff. Without rulling out such possibilities, I can convinced by the author's statement.
In short, we at least need to know more about the exact change of number of viewer during the past years and the reasons for companies to cancell their programs whit the program in oder to emulate the argument. Without the extra information, we can't say the argument is
- "Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned wit 30
- Are parents the best teachers? Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents are the best teachers. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- People attend college or university for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge). Why do you think people attend college or university? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 48
- People attend college or university for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge). Why do you think people attend college or university? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
Essay evaluation report
Sentence: The argument suggest that the late-night news program should restore the time devoted to wearther and local news to its former lever so as to attract more views to the program and to avoid losing any further advertising revenues.
Error: wearther Suggestion: weather
Sentence: The fist piece of evidence which may help us to emulate the advice is about wheter the increasing rate of complaints about the coverage of weather and local news to the sum of complains received from views are accompanied by a deceascing number of viewers.
Error: wheter Suggestion: whether
Error: deceascing Suggestion: deceasing
Sentence: The arguor assumes that the two phenomenon will necessar concur.
Error: arguor Suggestion: arguer
Error: necessar Suggestion: necessary
Sentence: But it's possible that the first one occurs without the second one, for more audiences who are interested in national news are attected, and they make less complaints.
Error: attected Suggestion: attested
Sentence: The second piece of evidence we need in order to fully emulate the argument involves the exact reason for local companies to cancell they their cooperation with the program.
Error: cancell Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: Based on the fact that the companies made their decision after the change of contents of the program, the author asumes there be a caulsal relationship between them.
Error: asumes Suggestion: assumes
Error: caulsal Suggestion: causal
Sentence: As the enterprices may curtail their advertising spend because of internal reasons, for instance financial difficulties, changes of development stratages and stuff.
Error: enterprices Suggestion: enterprises
Error: stratages Suggestion: No alternate word
Sentence: Without rulling out such possibilities, I can convinced by the author's statement.
Error: rulling Suggestion: ruling
Sentence: In short, we at least need to know more about the exact change of number of viewer during the past years and the reasons for companies to cancell their programs whit the program in oder to emulate the argument.
Error: cancell Suggestion: No alternate word
Error: oder Suggestion: over
----------------
argument 1 -- not OK
argument 2 -- OK
argument 3 -- ???
----------------
minimum 3 arguments wanted.
Need to argue against the conclusion always. For this topic it is:
Therefore, in order to attract more viewers to our news programs and to avoid losing any further advertising revenues, we should expand the coverage of weather and local news on all our news programs.
----------------
samples:
https://www.testbig.com/gmatgre-argument-task-essays/over-past-year-our…
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 2.0 out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 15 2
No. of Sentences: 13 15
No. of Words: 312 350
No. of Characters: 1547 1500
No. of Different Words: 175 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.203 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.958 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.612 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 116 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 88 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 56 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 32 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 24 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.469 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.538 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.336 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.336 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.133 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
The argument suggest that the late-night news program should...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ther and local news to its former lever so as to attract more views to the program and t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 474, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun complaints is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...tional news are attected, and they make less complaints. The second piece of evide...
^^^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...rily right, the mere sequence of events cant give strong support to the conclusion. ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 657, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'convince'
Suggestion: convince
...t rulling out such possibilities, I can convinced by the authors statement. In short, we...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 674, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...h possibilities, I can convinced by the authors statement. In short, we at least need ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 245, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ment. Without the extra information, we cant say the argument is
^^^^
Line 4, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...information, we cant say the argument is
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, so, as to, at least, for instance, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.6327345309 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 28.8173652695 66% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 55.5748502994 99% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 2260.96107784 69% => OK
No of words: 312.0 441.139720559 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03525641026 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.56307096286 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69435018678 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 204.123752495 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560897435897 0.468620217663 120% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 705.55239521 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 19.7664670659 66% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.4303419826 57.8364921388 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.846153846 119.503703932 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 23.324526521 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53846153846 5.70786347227 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 5.25449101796 152% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212481772084 0.218282227539 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058731829326 0.0743258471296 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0775434162076 0.0701772020484 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126637853827 0.128457276422 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613552954995 0.0628817314937 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.3799401198 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.5979740519 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.32208582834 108% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 98.500998004 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.