"A recent study rating 300 male and female Mention advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep the executives need and the success of their firms. Of the advertising firms studied, those whose executives reported needing no more than 6 hours of sleep per night had higher profit margins and faster growth. These results suggest that if a business wants to prosper, it should hire only people who need less than 6 hours of sleep per night."
Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on these assumptions and what the implications are for the argument if the assumptions prove unwarranted.
The given argument suggests that any advertisement firm should only hire people who need no more than six hours of sleep. This suggestion is built on many unstated unwarranted assumptions. Some of them are stated in the next paragraphs.
Firstly, the argument bases the profit just on amount of sleep executives of a firm would need. Profit can come from many factors. The purpose their products serve, their quality, firm’s advertising strategies. None of these are considered while relating number of hours of sleep to firm’s profit.
We also don’t know the percent distribution of executives from each firm who took part in the study. There is a possibility that there were no or lesser executives in the firm with higher profit taking part in the study who needed more sleep. Until a detailed report on the executives, taking the study, is stated, it will be unreasonable to conclude on the result.
Argument suggests that firm should only hire people who need less than 6 hours of sleep per night. This doesn’t consider the hiring on basis on executive’s skill or efficiency. What if the firm hires an executive just on basis of number of sleep hours, and he is not very good at his work? Still will this conclusion hold true? All these possibilities are not taken care in the argument.
Therefore, the given argument will fall apart if the above assumptions are not proved to be true, or convincing answer to the unanswered questions are not provided.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | yuktapradeep | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-08 | yuktapradeep | 55 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | DoveKerry | 68 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Jonginn | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-11 | Manisha_karim2804 | 60 | view |
- Two years ago, radio station WCQP in Rockville decided to increase the number of call-in advice programs that it broadcast; since that time, its share of the radio audience in the Rockville listening area has increased significantly. Given WCQP's recent s 42
- "Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by their own biological parents. However, my recent interviews with 53
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects.Use specific reasons and examples to supp 71
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and sup 58
- For this task, you will read a passage and then listen to a lecture on the same topic. You may take notes while you read and listen. Then, you will write a response to a question that asks you about the relationship between the reading and the lecture. Th 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 146, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... There is a possibility that there were no or lesser executives in the firm with h...
^^
Line 7, column 301, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Still,
...s, and he is not very good at his work? Still will this conclusion hold true? All the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, still, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.9520958084 77% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 11.1786427146 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 28.8173652695 52% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 55.5748502994 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1248.0 2260.96107784 55% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 249.0 441.139720559 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01204819277 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 4.56307096286 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81426114733 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 204.123752495 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582329317269 0.468620217663 124% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 705.55239521 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 22.8473053892 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.5351388593 57.8364921388 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0 119.503703932 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5625 23.324526521 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.70786347227 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235904293857 0.218282227539 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0761895463097 0.0743258471296 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712480599874 0.0701772020484 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122717508607 0.128457276422 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780091453663 0.0628817314937 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.3799401198 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.3550499002 134% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.197005988 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.5979740519 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 98.500998004 60% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 12.3882235529 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.1389221557 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.