All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Author claimed that the companies often take the services from the outside firm to resolve issues in the company." Wizened has less experience than the new perspicacious asset" is the fact stated by the author.
According to me the statement claimed is not true, because there are liable asset in the company who could resolve the tortuous issue easily using their experience. Many employees in the company has served for the company since archaic, though the inexperienced fresher cannot take the responsibility as he/she is an advent in the company.
Employee's are the core for any company since they know every "know-how" of the company."Efficiency of the company is directly proportional to the state of mind of the worker", meaning that the industrious attitude can only be elicited from them by ingenuous and caring attitude. Since they are more inclined to company's growth they are the only one who will think best for the company, rather hiring a firm which take the wholesome money and that too have no affection for the stated answer to the complexity.
Though the peripheral organization can have a new and creative perspective towards the company. Sometimes the tedious approach to solve the problem need a fresh mind to think i.e. "Thinking out of box". Since they have the firm so there main aim to resolve the complexity is the primary work, they are indulged in the problem solving every morning, But will be an intruder in the company. Hiring the firm means the lack of faith in the own employee. Often the workers feel ignored if they see that the outsider is solving the problem and thus there dedication and intent towards the work decreases which more affect to company's efficiency, ultimately "Employee is the informal Boss "in this modern world, but the creative approach of the outside consultants cannot be ignored, but will cost money on contrary whereas the worker will do with the daily wage and will feel competent enough to resolve the issue. Every company's layout is different and the technologies employed are also different so it will take time for the consultant to understand and act upon.
Aggregating the base line we get that the Employee can be proved viable asset for the company and will do the work taking pride but the creative approach of the consultants can't be ignored.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | Arpit Sahni | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | shamitha | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | caseya5 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Siddiqur Rahman | 50 | view |
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary. 66
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permi 50
- “In order to alleviate the serious unemployment problem in our town, we should encourage Autotech to build its automobile manufacturing plant in our area. The Hillview landfill, which has been undeveloped for decades, is a perfect site for this plant. T 50
- Some people believe that increasing violence in the media is the cause of increasing violence in our society, especially among children. Others believe that children's peer groups and parental role models are a much more powerful influence on childre 50
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permi 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...os; is the fact stated by the author. According to me the statement claimed is not true, beca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'assets'?
Suggestion: assets
...d is not true, because there are liable asset in the company who could resolve the to...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssue easily using their experience. Many employees in the company has served for ...
^^
Line 5, column 468, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to have'?
Suggestion: to have
...which take the wholesome money and that too have no affection for the stated answer to t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 174, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...he creative approach of the consultants cant be ignored.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.9520958084 108% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 28.8173652695 69% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 55.5748502994 72% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1986.0 2260.96107784 88% => OK
No of words: 391.0 441.139720559 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07928388747 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9675763913 2.78398813304 107% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 204.123752495 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511508951407 0.468620217663 109% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 705.55239521 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.76447105788 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 19.7664670659 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.8473053892 140% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 102.01181168 57.8364921388 176% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.5 119.503703932 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5833333333 23.324526521 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.70786347227 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 6.88822355289 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234542833171 0.218282227539 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912237183314 0.0743258471296 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569469477354 0.0701772020484 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141976456973 0.128457276422 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284131492598 0.0628817314937 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 14.3799401198 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 48.3550499002 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.197005988 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 12.5979740519 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.32208582834 109% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 98.500998004 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.1389221557 133% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.