There are various factors which determine whether a company or an organization would proliferate or not. One of the factors would be an auditor--who evaluate the performance statistics of the organization. Auditors can be internal--employees of the organization--or external--people who are paid externally and are not a part of the company. For a company to thrive and not debacle both internal and external auditors are extremely important.
Firstly, it can be safe to aver that the internal auditors and employees are tenuously more important than the external auditors. Mainly because these are the people who have been with the organization through its acclivity and declivity. Employees have seen the company reach its zenith and also the nadir and plausibly know the reason why the company hurtled to nadir in the first place. So it is limpid that employees have a pellucid picture of the situation than an external auditor and will also be able to provide a solution to reach the zenith.
Secondly, external auditors are quite important for a company as it is plausible that they have lifted another company which was in a similar abysmal. External auditors are trained, adept and have various solutions for which can make the proliferate. A bank which hires external auditors will do way better than a bank which doesn't hire an external auditor.
For instance, a perfect paragon for this would be Boeing. Boeing pays millions of dollars every year to grow and outperform its ardent rival Airbus. The millions of dollars spent do not go in vain since they get an outside perspective which the employees cannot discern. But this does not indicate that Boeing won't accept suggestions from its employees, it gives equal importance to both external and internal auditor which makes it come out of a labyrinth and proves why they are the big boss of the aircraft industry.
In a nutshell, For a company to navigate through a labyrinth and hit zenith, it is important to consult an external auditor which helps the company proliferate, but it is equally important to acknowledge the suggestions of the hoi-polloi who have been with the organization and have a clear picture of the situation and the reason they got here in the first place.
- The following is an excerpt from a speech given to the School Board about a change to the curriculum quot Because the future will be dominated by technology we must make four years of computer programming mandatory for all high school students If our s 65
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 83
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permi 50
- The following appeared as part of the Dean s newsletter The University of Wabash is considering a community service requirement for all undergraduate and graduate students We believe that the objective of any university is to produce well rounded and 60
- Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won t benefit their future careers 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ve various solutions for which can make the proliferate. A bank which hires external auditors w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...rs will do way better than a bank which doesnt hire an external auditor. For insta...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1881.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 373.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04289544236 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9170847396 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463806970509 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 599.4 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.0254135856 60.3974514979 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5625 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3125 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185599508528 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717334172711 0.0831039109588 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510637917814 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115692980635 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267929290224 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.