All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
It is critically important that companies operate efficiently as much as possible and thrive in all their projects. Personally, I believe that companies should listen to their employees. I feel this way for the following reasons, which I will explore in this essay.
First of all, employees are associated with the company for a very long time. Thus, employees know the pros and cons of the company. For Instance, an employee would have faced an issue with a project and since he knows every detail of the project, he will also know what should have been modified to do it better next time. So, if companies give a chance to an employee he can pitch a better idea for helping the company to work much more efficiently. This scenario was with respect to "one" employee but when a company gives a chance to all the employees then each and everyone can come up with a new idea. Based on this, I strongly feel that companies should give a chance to the employee for the betterment of the company.
Second of all, if companies value their employees by listening to them then they get emotionally connected to the company. If as an employer if I value my employees then they will be loyal to the company, so with this they can truly work hard and help the company to achieve greater profits. In contrast, if the company trusts some other consultants then the employees might not get adjusted to them. It is also possible that they are not willing to do things according to the consultants. Perhaps in the future, they start searching for another job. Based on this, I strongly feel the company should prioritize employees.
However, the other side of the picture also needs to be discussed. Consultants might suggest different ideas which the employees might not know. For instance, these consultants would have associated with many companies and they know how to help the company for raising efficiency. They know how to tweak these problems and provide a solution. It is always good to have a third-person point of view from the outside world. As a result, it is good to take the consultant's point of view.
On a conclusive note, I strongly feel that companies should listen to their employees. This is because they are connected to the company for a longer time and if the company values them then they will be loyal and work hard.
All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-15 | Aishwarya01 | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | Isolus | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-23 | bacec | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | Adesina Boluwatito | 83 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | Theophilus Ebuka Odoh | 50 | view |
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 50
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 50
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the complaints re 62
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, which I will explore in this essay. First of all, employees are associated w...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...yee for the betterment of the company. Second of all, if companies value their ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e company should prioritize employees. However, the other side of the picture a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, then, third, thus, for instance, i feel, in contrast, as a result, first of all, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2124.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 444.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78378378378 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67694937379 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.427927927928 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 640.8 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.5625819657 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.96 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.76 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.56 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.487753326613 0.243740707755 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154403734887 0.0831039109588 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154467966401 0.0758088955206 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.326190128592 0.150359130593 217% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.237281031907 0.0667264976115 356% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 48.8420337079 146% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.83 8.38706741573 81% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.