Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
The author concludes that inoculations against cow flu must not be permitted because there is a small possibility that a person will die. However, the author supports his conclusion with three assumptions that, if not substantiated, dramatically weakens the persuasiveness of the argument.
first of all, How is the disease detected? People may be purposely telling that they are infected with cow flu so that they get extra attention and help from the government. Or perhaps, the officials working in these areas are deliberately making up things so that they could receive more money from the government for vaccinations and then use it for their own personal purpose. If it is true that all the checkups are done properly then also there is a possibility that the reports which are getting generated in false. If either case is true, then the author's claim about disease detection is not overly persuasive.
Finally, it is stated that there is a chance that a person inoculated will die. How is it possible? perhaps only the people who are fully infected with cow flu are dying even after getting vaccinated. It is possible that their body is not reacting to the medicine and it is likely that it is reacting negatively. Perhaps people are dying because they are not properly taking the dose and are missing the second or the third dose. It is also possible that they are not taking the proper precautions after getting vaccinated. They might be eating unhealthy food which is not recommended. If either of these scenarios has merit, then the author's assertion that people will die after getting vaccinated is invalid.
If the author is able to answer the three questions above and offer more evidence, then it will be possible to fully evaluate the viability of the proposed recommendation to not permit inoculation against cow flu.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-29 | dkim1206 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | wcfr | 60 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | riyarmy | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-12 | Nowshin Tabassum | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Mizanur_Rahman | 55 | view |
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 50
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary 50
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the complaints re 62
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 50
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 5 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 4 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 309 350
No. of Characters: 1502 1500
No. of Different Words: 151 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.193 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.861 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.675 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 102 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 78 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 55 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 34 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.071 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.964 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.343 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.343 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.049 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 512, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ving the place once they know that they dont have cow flu because they dont want to ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 543, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...hat they dont have cow flu because they dont want to be vaccinated. If either of the...
^^^^
Line 2, column 618, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...er of these scenarios is true, then the authors contention that all people should be va...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... use it for their own personal purpose. If it is true that all the checkups are do...
^^
Line 4, column 100, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Perhaps
...noculated will die. How is it possible? perhaps only the people who are fully infected ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 635, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... of these scenarios has merit, then the authors assertion that people will die after ge...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, third, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 43.0 19.6327345309 219% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 13.6137724551 169% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 28.8173652695 163% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 55.5748502994 63% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2106.0 2260.96107784 93% => OK
No of words: 432.0 441.139720559 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.875 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74414437681 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 204.123752495 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.428240740741 0.468620217663 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 671.4 705.55239521 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.96107784431 121% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.70958083832 221% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 19.7664670659 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.1764218471 57.8364921388 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.7272727273 119.503703932 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6363636364 23.324526521 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04545454545 5.70786347227 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352495638066 0.218282227539 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114060157155 0.0743258471296 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0920697134029 0.0701772020484 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209862752461 0.128457276422 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537978681928 0.0628817314937 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 14.3799401198 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.3550499002 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.5979740519 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.32208582834 87% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 98.500998004 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.