Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Probity does not always provide a leader with a boon.
A strong scrupulous nature in a leader can enable him or her to make decisions that is often venerated in the world. For example, Mahatma Gandhi was esteemed for his sound moral judgement, even great world leaders like Nelson Mandela followed his path of non-violence. He is still venerated as a world leader in the entire world. Hence, sound moral judgement has a perennial effect in the world.
While strong moral conscience can be valued in the world, it may have a subversive effect on the people immediately affected by that conscience. People often consider the immediate consequences of a judgement and not the long term ones and hence they value only those decisions that have an immediate positive effect on them. Hence, in this case, the leader will not be venerated by the public for his or her decisions and since a leader's strength is ultimately decided by the support he or she has among the public, maintaining the respect of his or her peers becomes the primary objective of a leader.
The leader should also be able to ponder out the consequences of a moral action as some people might exploit this conscience in him or her and they might involve in complicit actions. Hence, leaders should be incisive and make a decision only after deliberate consideration of every possible repercussion. In this way, a leader can protect its people from any threats and hence maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Morality and ethics are often associated with humanity and hence, sound moral judgement often leads us to a more harmonious world. A sound moral judgement has a positive effect on majority of the mankind.
Moral conscience is a very vital quality in a leader, but a leader's strength is determined by the peers exhorting him or her, it is also vital for a leader to maintain the respect of his or her people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Adelaida | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 50 | view |
- It is more important to keep your old friends than to make new friends 60
- Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach 66
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society. 50
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting lethargy and other signs of illness After the recall the pet food company tested samples from the recalled food an 50
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled foo 49
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...ic for his or her decisions and since a leaders strength is ultimately decided by the s...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 61, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...a very vital quality in a leader, but a leaders strength is determined by the peers exh...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, may, so, still, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 328.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76524390244 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66064577051 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469512195122 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5376000549 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.642857143 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345066731011 0.243740707755 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126405621154 0.0831039109588 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748810502127 0.0758088955206 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186330094509 0.150359130593 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754419058961 0.0667264976115 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.