Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Effectiveness of leaders is often measured by the results produced by them; and roles played by their teams. A good team always works in unison towards their goals in line with guidance and roles defined by the leader. And members would follow a leader if they respect him/her and their judgement. A sound moral judgment is a driving factor in ability of a leader to gain and maintain respect of his/her peers, hence one is dependent on an other.
While all leaders may face several moral dilemmas over course of time, their consistency and just behavior plays a key role in ensuring that the team performs well and as per moral standards defined. A good leader always keeps morales of his/her team high and ensures that every one feels motivated, important and satisfied by communicating well and showing trust. All members are aware that by no means there contributions are unnoticed or unimportant, even if they seem smaller as compared to others.
As human nature has it all leaders may have some favorites or peers on whom they depend more as compared to others. Such dilemmas, if involve such persons become even more testing for leaders since any deviation from standards or any lapse in judgement due for bias would result in huge disgruntleness and loss of reputation for them. Hence, even if moral judgement may seem unimportant as compared to abiltiy to maintain respect but it is a key determinant and of paramount importance.
Although leaders can use authoritarian tactics to keep their teem in check and get output, but even if it seems the peers are respecting them, infact they would be afraid of the leader. Hence team members would not perform at the optimum level.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Adelaida | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 50 | view |
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs 51
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership 83
- Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won t benefit their future careers 66
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead 58
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems 33
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 438, Rule ID: AN_OTHER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'another'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: another
...is/her peers, hence one is dependent on an other. While all leaders may face several ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... unimportant, even if they seem smaller as compared to others. As human nature ...
^^
Line 5, column 94, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...rites or peers on whom they depend more as compared to others. Such dilemmas, if i...
^^
Line 7, column 187, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...act they would be afraid of the leader. Hence team members would not perform at the o...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, so, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 288.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88194444444 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59984827133 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572916666667 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 704.065955056 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1245295068 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.166666667 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330245081466 0.243740707755 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116028090052 0.0831039109588 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108692299295 0.0758088955206 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185545646311 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0935537813812 0.0667264976115 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.