Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Morality plays a vital role in any lifecycle of the generations. We oursleves are the primary judgmentalists when it comes to self moral decisions, then why would we even support our peers when it's time to take actions on moral use-cases. As a leader one should be hard proofed within moral environments and being morally inclined while making decisions will make him or her eminent.
While moving towards globalisation, our office cultures have modified and have become more elaborated. In Tech-savvy industries the role of team leader is prominent and the decisions made by them enriches the project implemented for the company. If the team leader is more inclined towards their team members comfort and not on making sound moral judgment then the project is likely to be doomed. One such instance happened in Microsoft--an IT company, where a team was preparing a bot for facial recognition. One of the team members had the access to all the files of the project and had communicated it to the other company that built a similar bot and released it earlier into the market. Amazon had to bear huge losses because of this situation. Had the team leader been vigilant and made sound moral judgements while sharing the files to the team this would have not happened.
Similarly, if we look on a mid-scale issues, cyber attacks, mobile hacking and many more such use cases have been identified because of lack of judgments on ethics and values. In a political industry(large-scale issues), judgements by the leader play a significant role as it affects the people of the country. In India, we have 20 people in the running constitution along with Prime Minister. If one of the parliament members is corrupted and is misusing the powers given, as the Prime minister what should be done? That said, should the prime minister support and maintain respect of the member or a strict action should be taken against the member?
To conclude, sound moral judgments in any industry, any situation is of extreme importance and a leader you should be morally inclined.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Adelaida | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 50 | view |
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 50
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 50
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 50
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain the reasoning for the position you take In development and supporting you 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 444, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'companies'?
Suggestion: companies
...h instance happened in Microsoft--an IT company, where a team was preparing a bot for f...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'powers'' or 'power's'?
Suggestion: powers'; power's
...embers is corrupted and is misusing the powers given, as the Prime minister what shoul...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, similarly, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 346.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95086705202 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86672715155 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526011560694 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6348122452 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.0625 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.21951772744 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15178647558 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479511456016 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563114573356 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111389699293 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702445310652 0.0667264976115 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.