Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers

Essay topics:

Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.

Deviation from moral judgement for peers as a leader has a negative impact on the judgement of the leader and questions his credibility as a great leader. This comes from being liberal towards peers who assist in creating greater impact but has dirty hands towards morals.

Leadership is an art and practised correctly will create a greater impact in the society and brings greater outcome from the believed cause. SpaceX, the most valuable company in the world endorses moral judgement to the core. Had seen a fair share of losses but with meticulous research and learning from mistakes under great leadership, they can getting ready for star link to be established space. In contrast, to NASA where peers had a lot of emphases, and the leadership team had to consider a lot of factors other than the output and what's the teammate bringing on to the table.

The root cause of corruption comes from the same place where a leader's ability to counter representatives wrongdoings. As a leader one has to ensure that his peers are treated at a good value to have a serious impact on society. Otherwise, this would have catastrophic repercussions leading to tremendous loss and shift in governments. However, knowing facts leader's can't swish their wands to change the scenario pertaining to this idea as replacements are hard to find and the cause goes to a toss if they have to revamp the system.

Despite this leader's should respect peers respect as they are under the shadow of the leader and any wrongdoings are directly questioned on the leadership. Therefore, taking the charge and correcting the scenario to maintain peace would be a great leadership trait.

Leadership is questioned on the peers wrongdoings, keeping in mind the good things that can be achieved over the moral judement one has to be active in understanding the nuances of the act. Not to take the actions to the face value.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'get'
Suggestion: get
...stakes under great leadership, they can getting ready for star link to be established s...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 540, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
...ot of factors other than the output and whats the teammate bringing on to the table. ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...ption comes from the same place where a leaders ability to counter representatives wron...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...to counter representatives wrongdoings. As a leader one has to ensure that his pee...
^^
Line 5, column 368, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...rnments. However, knowing facts leaders cant swish their wands to change the scenari...
^^^^
Line 7, column 9, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...y have to revamp the system. Despite this leaders should respect peers respect as...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, therefore, as to, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 322.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91925465839 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73266514911 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537267080745 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5407367792 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.142857143 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64285714286 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19679245297 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0652147490504 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710823963862 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110105496106 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565955350311 0.0667264976115 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.