In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Don’t live in the past don’t live in the feature focused on present to achieve your dreams. Prompt states that, in any field of endeavour, it is impossible to make contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievement. In my not so humble opinion, I disagree with this statement for following reasons.
To begin with, people change according to time, so predicating one’s present contribution by judging his/her past is erroneous. Maybe, at first person is not serious related his work so it is blatant that he will experience more failure than achievement. In this case we cannot conclude that person is not capable to do given task. For instance, I have seen some students who were not serious about studies and experience debacle failure. But as the time past they got serious at studies and started studying hard and got good grades. In such case past achievement doesn’t matter if person is capable then he/she can significantly contribute.
Moreover, sometimes such situations are created in the life that drag person down in his/her work and it exacerbates their situation. In this case it is not plausible to judge person on his/her past achievement because it is blatant that such people will have less achievements. This does not mean that they are not capable. For exemplar, prime minister of India Narendra Modi who use sell a tea at a railway station at that time he was poor and was fighting with some financial problem if he would have thought the same way that, “I don’t have any education or I don’t have any achievement in political background” Then he would have never been prime minister of India. This proves that past achievement has nothing to do with present.
Finally, sometime some people are not enticed towards some task or they are doing it forcefully then it is blatant that they will experience some setbacks that do not mean person is not capable to make significant contribution. For example, if a student is week in one subject and he/she has experienced some setbacks that does not mean he/she is week at study. It is blatant from this example that if person is not enticed towards one of his/her task that doesnot mean he/she should not make any contribution.
In conclusion, it’s not apt to decide your contribution by judging ones past. In my point of view this statement seems to be dubious.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun achievements is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...t is blatant that such people will have less achievements. This does not mean that t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 494, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had thought'?
Suggestion: had thought
...hting with some financial problem if he would have thought the same way that, “I don’t have any ed...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 738, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...evement has nothing to do with present. Finally, sometime some people are not en...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 68, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... to decide your contribution by judging ones past. In my point of view this statemen...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, if, may, moreover, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.6327345309 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 13.6137724551 118% => OK
Pronoun: 65.0 28.8173652695 226% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 55.5748502994 97% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 16.3942115768 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1980.0 2260.96107784 88% => OK
No of words: 402.0 441.139720559 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92537313433 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69616858091 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 204.123752495 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485074626866 0.468620217663 104% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 705.55239521 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 0.0 8.76447105788 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.22255489022 213% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.8460453717 57.8364921388 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.210526316 119.503703932 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1578947368 23.324526521 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52631578947 5.70786347227 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.20758483034 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.67664670659 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150521743876 0.218282227539 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564759203112 0.0743258471296 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779025965185 0.0701772020484 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110154100566 0.128457276422 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919630165795 0.0628817314937 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.3799401198 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.3550499002 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.197005988 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.5979740519 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.32208582834 91% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 98.500998004 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.