In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution
without first being strongly influenced by past achievements in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or
disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you
take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways
in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these
considerations shape your position.
With the advent of any inventions or creativities in the world, be it in very trivial scenarios to the huge culmination of development through various aspects, needs the perseverance and tenacity in that field. One who grips the realm of area with determination can achieve whatever he/ she aspires to. In this contemplation, I disagree with the aforementioned prompt of past events being the only strong influence for the achievements.
One can enlist hundreds of names from the histories who had significant and noble contribution to our world. There are diverse fields where new yet innovative, which in the earlier thought to be impossible, are made. From the daily usage of appliances at home, to the services on road via buses, to the flying aeroplane, our ancestors would hardly have thought of anything such to be possible but at the end, we are here, living in that moment.
When looking at the instances of achievements, one would hardly forget Thomas Edison. Whole world directly or indirectly acknowledges him for his contributions. If he had not dare to do something new than we would have probably lived in the dark, only relying on conventional methods of brightness. Initially he was admonished and discouraged stating that it was nearly impossible but his determination leads to the place where we are now.
In this regard, it would be very unwise not to enlist aerodynamics achievements. Today people are traveling at the moon and mars, could easily get accessed on the information of whole solar system, hundreds of satellites are installed to get us facilitated with technological inventions. These in fact are very less influenced by the past activities. Twenty first century has been the era of technologies, only because of the mindset of people, thinking ahead of past.
Furthermore, great minds have great impacts on the societies. Not to forget, past do have certain level of impacts on people. Without past failures, future possibilities are very less. Talking about the failure, most of the people in Nepal are aware how hard it was to treat eye related problems in economic way in last decades, is actually made easier by Mr. Sanduik Ruit now, whose contribution in the field of ophthalmology is known in whole Asia. Ironically, here failure was not the lack of achievements but it was the desire which none felt but Sanduk Ruit-introduced low-cost and effective intraocular lenses.
When it is true that we must always be motivated towards the new paths, it is equally true that no one can achieve higher if he/she does not challenge the existing boundaries created by himself or by the society. The outcome of any activities would be unclear if one lives under the influence of restrictions. Not to forget, knowledge and experience of requisites should be the best teacher but the aspirations must lead people in a positive way in a significant manner so that none things can restrict him/ her if he/ she aspires to be great, to do great.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-24 | furtile45 | 58 | view |
| 2023-02-24 | furtile45 | 58 | view |
| 2022-06-30 | ashbin_bhat | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-28 | koshagohil | 58 | view |
| 2021-07-16 | Geet@3 | 58 | view |
- The recent report from the marketing department suggests that there is a need for allocation of a greater budget for the Super Screen movies to increase awareness This is based on the pretext that very few people attended the Super Screen Movies this year 59
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and 67
- A recently issued twenty year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin a medicine used to treat headaches Al 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'dared', 'durst'.
Suggestion: dared; durst
...im for his contributions. If he had not dare to do something new than we would have ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 351, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: Twenty-first
...less influenced by the past activities. Twenty first century has been the era of technologie...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 299, Rule ID: ECONOMIC_ECONOMICAL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economical' (=affordable, cheap)?
Suggestion: economical
...it was to treat eye related problems in economic way in last decades, is actually made e...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 429, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...er but the aspirations must lead people in a positive way in a significant manner so that none th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 447, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a significant manner" with adverb for "significant"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ions must lead people in a positive way in a significant manner so that none things can restrict him/ h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, furthermore, if, look, so, as to, in fact, talking about, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2480.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 497.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98993963783 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98164016787 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 281.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565392354125 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 784.8 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.5395803985 60.3974514979 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.727272727 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5909090909 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184446138687 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507720311853 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044193918917 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0910580891595 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515329181594 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 100.480337079 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.