In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In any field of work, it is stated that "Once an expert was also a beginner".Beginners and experts make different contributions while working in any field. The prompt recommends that in the field of inquiry, a beginner has better chances to make important contributions than experts. I strongly disagree with this statement and argue that an expert is more likely to make important contributions in the field of inquiry than a beginner for two reasons.
To begin with, in any field of work it takes years for people to master their art. Firstly, when they enter a particular field they do not have any knowledge about what operations are performed in this field, what is the process flow and what are the tools required to perform various tasks in this field. So firstly when a person enters a field they are beginners. Beginners mean basically people who are starting out to do new work. Now by learning slowly and steadily it takes years for a person to become an expert, given that he follows a proper roadmap. For instance, now let us consider the field of inquiry, people having great communicative skills can only survive in this field. So basically a person who is in this field should be able to clear the doubts of the customers effectively, otherwise, the reputation of the company is compromised. Developing communication skills is not a one-day job. It takes a lot of time to develop communication skills. So therefore an expert who is in this field of inquiry solving people's queries for years is more likely to make important contributions than a person who is starting out to work and develop his communication skills.
Further, nowadays beginners or freshers are very well versed with communication, but they do not have any practical experience. It is said that "True character and strength of the fish is tested when it swims in the sea".So to develop all the required skills a beginner will take considerable time. For instance, suppose a beginner has good communication skills but the customer gets angry about a particular thing and is not ready to listen to the employee and wants to talk to the manager or write bad reviews about the company and is demanding immediate attention with the help of some tools. A beginner with no practical experience will get tensed and would not be able to handle the customer properly and the company will receive a red flag from the customers. So in this case an expert who has great practical experience can handle the situation properly, tell the customer to calm down, and tell him that his issue will be resolved as early as possible. So by this, we can see that an expert user has more chances to make important contributions for the benefit of the company than any employee who is just starting out.
Of course, some will argue that a beginner with good communication skills, marks, and decent knowledge can contribute significantly in the field of inquiry. But as we have seen in any field, in this case, the field of inquiry a beginner can contribute well to an organization but with less practical experience and knowledge about handling difficult situations, he can never contribute more than an expert who has been working in this field for past several years. Thus it can be concluded that an expert is more likely to make important contributions to an organization than a beginner.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-19 | Marqueetim | 43 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Dipesh1234 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-19 | nigarsafarova | 75 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | Bidusik47 | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Sophy@ | 50 | view |
- People s attitudes are determined more by their immediate situation or surroundings than by society as a whole Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position y 66
- Claim Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed Reason It is inappropriate and perhaps even cruel to use public resources to fund the arts when people s basic needs are not b 66
- Some people believe that scientific discoveries have given us a much better understanding of the world around us Others believe that science has revealed to us that the world is infinitely more complex than we ever realized Write a response in which you d 68
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Beginners
...nce an expert was also a beginner'.Beginners and experts make different contribution...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 965, Rule ID: SO_THEREFORE[1]
Message: Use simply 'So' or 'therefore'.
Suggestion: So; Therefore
...f time to develop communication skills. So therefore an expert who is in this field of inqui...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
...s tested when it swims in the sea'.So to develop all the required skills a be...
^^
Line 7, column 466, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...g in this field for past several years. Thus it can be concluded that an expert is m...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, of course, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2808.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 578.0 442.535393258 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85813148789 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.90322654589 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92585874873 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.413494809689 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 880.2 704.065955056 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.6127310864 60.3974514979 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.636363636 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2727272727 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.68181818182 5.21951772744 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256754908366 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095298558115 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.081751156575 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203744153964 0.150359130593 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796825876552 0.0667264976115 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.