In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position
As seen in today's developing worl, with each generation the depts of knowledge that one achieves throughout his contribution as well as the contributions made by the person in the field can be seen in a growing trend. Taking such observations in account, the provided prompt makes an inference that the beginner is more likely than an expert to make important contributions for any field in question. While, I mostly agree with this statement due to the two reasons explored in the impending paragraph, I beileve that such observations are not axiomatic for all the fields.
Firstly, for any field of study, as compared to the past, the knowledge accumulated is often in greater amount, which means the level of naivety or confusion related to the field is also at a lower level. Such that, a beginner joining the field has ample information available to them , acquired by the luminaries in the field through tedious trials and failures. For example; the scientific field of palentology, long considered a dead science, is now making huge strides in the scientific community recently, which can only be attributed to the neophytes in the field. As theses newer scientist have are backed by years of research and knowledge from their predecessors, along with modern technology to their aid, making then have a greater likelyhood to be sucessful and make notable contributions to the field.
Besides the years of knowledge to their aid, the beginners also bring fresher perspectives which is often a necessity in any field. The experts are often less likely to change their opinions and be headstrong to their rudimentary beilefs, making them less likely to choose a newer way to expore the problem in hand. But, with the involvement of a beginners brings an newer pliable perspective, who are open to applying newwer techinques and methodologies, which have been found fruitful in contributing to any field. The boom in the field of micro-biology, with the influx of newer biologists who adopted CRISPR technology, while the erudites wouldn.t budge to change their technology perfectly exemplifies how beginners are often likely to sucees just because of their openness and neivety.
Hovever, I do concede that such cases are not seen in every field of study, as can be seen in the field of liberal arts and philoshopy. Though the influx of newer indivisuals have not ceseased in these fields, the ones making the major contributions are ones with years of hardwork and perseverence required to sharpen their talents. The art scene has seen only a few new artist in the verge of stardom, while the ones in the pedestle making major strides are the ones who are expert at the stream.
In conclusion, it can be implied that beginners in most of the filed are likely to make noticable impact in the feild, as they posses new perspectives with less biases as well as myriads of knowledge acquired by the expert predessors in their predisposition. But, some field requires a sharp skillset which can only be acquired by years of practice, thus stopping beginners to make a huge contribution.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-25 | Dipesh1234 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-19 | nigarsafarova | 75 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | Bidusik47 | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Sophy@ | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | soap | 66 | view |
- The knowledge of maths is not important for most jobs nowadays To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- Some people think that internet has brought people closer together while others think that people and communities are become more isolated Discuss both sides and give your opinion 80
- Some people say that history offers no practical benefit to society while others claim that history teaches us to understand the present Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 84
- With the increased global demand for oil and gas undiscovered areas of the world should be opened up to access more resources To what extent do you agree with this statement 70
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 454, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tly agree with this statement due to the two reasons explored in the impending pa...
^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... has ample information available to them , acquired by the luminaries in the field...
^^
Line 3, column 603, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...e field. As theses newer scientist have are backed by years of research and knowled...
^^^
Line 5, column 346, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a beginner' or simply 'beginners'?
Suggestion: a beginner; beginners
...m in hand. But, with the involvement of a beginners brings an newer pliable perspective, wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...h the involvement of a beginners brings an newer pliable perspective, who are open...
^^
Line 7, column 435, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... stardom, while the ones in the pedestle making major strides are the ones who ar...
^^
Line 9, column 157, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun biases is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...d, as they posses new perspectives with less biases as well as myriads of knowledge ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2582.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 516.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00387596899 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76609204519 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86994084035 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467054263566 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 803.7 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.7219516201 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.375 118.986275619 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.25 23.4991977007 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249917399929 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935397775175 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534029263674 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150134288281 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572605937752 0.0667264976115 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 14.1392134831 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 48.8420337079 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 100.480337079 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 454, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tly agree with this statement due to the two reasons explored in the impending pa...
^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... has ample information available to them , acquired by the luminaries in the field...
^^
Line 3, column 603, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...e field. As theses newer scientist have are backed by years of research and knowled...
^^^
Line 5, column 346, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a beginner' or simply 'beginners'?
Suggestion: a beginner; beginners
...m in hand. But, with the involvement of a beginners brings an newer pliable perspective, wh...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...h the involvement of a beginners brings an newer pliable perspective, who are open...
^^
Line 7, column 435, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... stardom, while the ones in the pedestle making major strides are the ones who ar...
^^
Line 9, column 157, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun biases is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...d, as they posses new perspectives with less biases as well as myriads of knowledge ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 81.0 58.6224719101 138% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2582.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 516.0 442.535393258 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00387596899 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76609204519 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86994084035 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467054263566 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 803.7 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.7219516201 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.375 118.986275619 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.25 23.4991977007 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249917399929 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0935397775175 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534029263674 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150134288281 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572605937752 0.0667264976115 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 14.1392134831 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 48.8420337079 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 100.480337079 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.