In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
I disagree with the statement that in any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions. While beginners may bring fresh perspectives and enthusiasm, expertise and experience are typically more critical factors in making substantial contributions in most fields.
Firstly, expertise and experience often go hand in hand with a deep understanding of the field and its nuances. Experts have typically spent years or even decades honing their skills and knowledge, which allows them to identify unexplored avenues, challenges, and potential breakthroughs. Their accumulated knowledge and insights are invaluable when tackling complex problems.
Moreover, experts possess a broader and more comprehensive view of the existing body of knowledge within their field. They are aware of prior research, methodologies, and the historical context, which helps them build upon existing work and avoid repeating past mistakes. Beginners may lack this foundational knowledge, making it more challenging for them to make groundbreaking contributions without reinventing the wheel.
Furthermore, experts often have access to resources, networks, and collaboration opportunities that beginners may not. They can leverage their reputation and connections to gain access to funding, research facilities, and other critical resources needed for significant contributions.
While beginners can bring a fresh perspective and unconventional thinking to a field, their lack of experience and expertise may hinder their ability to navigate the complexities and nuances that experts understand well. Additionally, the learning curve for beginners can be steep, requiring time to acquire the necessary knowledge and skills.
However, it’s important to note that there are specific situations where beginners can indeed make important contributions, particularly in fields that are rapidly evolving or undergoing paradigm shifts. In such cases, newcomers may challenge established norms and bring disruptive innovations. Additionally, interdisciplinary collaboration between beginners and experts can yield valuable insights by combining the expertise of the seasoned professional with the creative thinking of the novice.
In conclusion, while beginners can bring fresh perspectives and unconventional ideas to a field, expertise and experience are generally more crucial for making substantial contributions. Experts possess a deep understanding of the field, access to resources, and the ability to build upon existing knowledge. However, the interaction between beginners and experts can be a powerful catalyst for innovation and progress, highlighting the value of collaboration and interdisciplinary approaches in advancing knowledge and solving complex problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-19 | Marqueetim | 43 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Dipesh1234 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-19 | nigarsafarova | 75 | view |
| 2023-09-18 | Bidusik47 | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | Sophy@ | 50 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 43
- In most professions and academic fields imagination is more important than knowledge 83
- Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the posit 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
I disagree with the statement that in any...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as to, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2420.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 390.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.20512820513 5.05705443957 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40435579747 2.79657885939 122% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512820512821 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 728.1 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.59117977528 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0923498696 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.444444444 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21022865117 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075045762415 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0803299699626 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1156293353 0.150359130593 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0723099550195 0.0667264976115 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 14.1392134831 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 48.8420337079 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.74 12.1639044944 154% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.