There is a conception that companies get more profits from amateurs compared to senior workers. Although, there is an exceptional case against this position, I mostly agree with it, and will explain in below paragraphs.
Experience of employees can be a crucial factor in solving problematic situations. For example, nowadays, companies instead of hiring senior workers, try to use services of consulting companies. The reason for this situation is related to the necessity of experienced specialist in the area. Companies despite paying more for consultants, still need their methods for finding logical solutions. Few years ago, British Petrol company hired only experts to prevent oil leakage to Caspian Sea, after explosion in one of its oil rigs. Thus, it is logical to assume that in exceptional times of need, where practical knowledge of years is necessary, older ones contribute to the situation more.
However, if we analyze general trend instead of exceptional case, it is possible to observe that original ideas come to light mainly thanks to novices. There is even a recent scientific research that proves, people’s brains function differently when limits or barriers are added to the question, compared to thinking freely. In experiment, one group was given only 3 main paths to solve arithmetic question, while second group did not get any tips. Contrary to expected, second group solved the equation faster and more efficiently. Such example proves that beginners have advantage over seniors, as they do not know the “rules” of the “game”. Thank to such difference, they can use creative side of their brains more easily and come up with new ideas.
Also, there is another aspect to comparison between older and younger workers. Internships who are at the beginning of their careers, have more ambition and will to prove themselves compared to specialist, who already reached their peak. Even there is a report which backs up the notion that internships work harder to secure a position, while people who already are confident in their position as a worker try to keep work-life balance and relax more. Thus, inexperienced beginner employees contribute to the company’s overall success more thanks to their “hunger” towards new career prospects.
In conclusion, although, in life-death situations lead of experienced seniors is essential and their contribution to the company is well acknowledged, generally novices can bring up better ideas due their limitless view and work harder because of their will to achieve career success.
- 1 quot Commuters complain that increased rush hour traffic on Blue Highway between the suburbs and the city center has doubled their commuting time The favored proposal of the motorists 039 lobby is to widen the highway adding an additional lane of 69
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions 66
- 23 Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 66
- The best ideas arise from a passionate interest in commonplace things 58
- Hospital statistics regarding people who go to the emergency room after roller skating accidents indicate the need for more protective equipment Within that group of people 75 percent of those who had accidents in streets or parking lots had not been we 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[5]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'recent scientific research'.
Suggestion: recent scientific research
...mainly thanks to novices. There is even a recent scientific research that proves, people’s brains function d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, still, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2168.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 404.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36633663366 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83289456882 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59900990099 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 666.0 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3482171653 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.105263158 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2631578947 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63157894737 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105611607644 0.243740707755 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0313243195453 0.0831039109588 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0326795103387 0.0758088955206 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0530009457714 0.150359130593 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219072264683 0.0667264976115 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.38706741573 118% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 100.480337079 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.